Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's chaotic life, advances in technology have brought complexity to a plethora of areas, in which businesses are not an exception. In this line of thought, some people believe that laborers are more satisfied when they engage in several affairs in a workday, while others hold the opposite view, thinking that exerting alike tasks is more pleasing. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two primary reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, doing the same thing every day brings mastering, causing accomplishing the work perfectly, which in turn enhances positive emotions. To be more specific, workers build their skills by repeating a task several times. As the number of repetitions increases, the depth of laborers' perception of that task also increases. In this case, the employees become professionals in their tasks, which consequently makes them proud of all of their high-yielding efforts. I take myself as an example to clarify this complex context. When I was at Tehran University, I worked as a research assistant for one of my professors. My professor insisted on dedicating a specified duty to each person and mine was culturing bacteria. Even though I learned culturing principles in my bachelor program, repeating that work every day made me figure out challenges and overcome them. After a while, I became so dominant in the bacterial culture that I got in charge of teaching it to fresh students, which made me so glad.
Second, by doing resembling work and elevating output, employees can prove themselves to their job owners, resulting in gaining promotions and raising salaries that cheer them up. As a matter of fact, if employees implement the same work every day, they will memorize the process precisely and even fuse some levels into one in order to make the process be done more swiftly. In this way, they are able to make more results in a defined amount of time. According to the fact that the output of individuals determines the efficiency of production in a business, owners will embrace keeping these valuable highly productive workers by offering raises in their revenue or organization position. Hence, this encourages employees to work even harder and become prosperous.
To sum up, carrying out similar duties during the workday elevates the euphoria level of employees not only by creating profound skills and enjoying the sense of being productive but also through attaining high efficiency and generating the basis for job promotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 73
- TPO49 80
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 90
- TPO42 80
- TPO68 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to culture'.
Suggestion: to culture
...lturing bacteria. Even though I learned culturing principles in my bachelor program, repe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, while, as a matter of fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14805825243 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80610553073 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6982625923 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166519680586 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044989069235 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408749466052 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924101464974 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376965390602 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.