Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All University students should be required to take history class regardless of their major subject. Use specific reasons to support your answer.
In the contemporary world, colleges often conduct a wide variety of courses to enhance students knowledge, typically the history course. But, as per my concern, it is not necessary for all graduate students to take the history course. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, studying history at the University level is a waste of time because students have a lot of work to do. College students often focus on a specific field of study, and they have to finish a lot of assignments to fulfill that course requirement; adding history subject to that major is hard for students to manage time. Consider my personal experience is the best example to illustrate this. I am a migrated student from India, studying at Ohio State University for my master’s in Health Informatics field, my course needs to complete two assignments every day along with one powerpoint presentation. But, because of the international student, I should finish American history in the first semester. As a student, it is difficult for me to manage time to complete both the homework every day. Some times I couldn’t concentrate on the main subject, and it hurt the grads. If I don’t have the History class, I could have performed better in the major subject.
Secondly, studying the history course at University level is a waste of money because most of the students already completed while studying primary school, hence studying history course at college are reputational, and it costs a lot of money. We all know, university education is more expensive than primary school because we have to pay fees for an individual subject. If the college adds a history course to all the students, they could spend extra money for nothing. For example, my brother, who is studying a Master’s in Pharmaceutical Sciences at Findlay University. According to the University policy, it is necessary for all the student to complete art history before issuing the degree certificate, and the cost of the course is five thousand dollars. My brother already competed for art history online course, but still, he has to pay the fees for the same subject, and it is merely wasting students money. If the university considers his previous certificate, He could save some money and used it for next term fees.
In a nutshell, Although some activists don’t agree with my opinion, studying history at university level is not significant. This is because of wasting valuable time and money. I recommend students not to take any history course along with your major.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Imagine you if a professor or a lecture given you the wrong information to the audience, when did you ask the question?During the meeting or after the meeting. 43
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
- the effectiveness of internal combustion over the fuel-cell engine in automobiles. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 984, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... performed better in the major subject. Secondly, studying the history course at...
^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it costs a lot of money. We all know, university education is more expensive t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for example, i feel, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01157407407 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85892937162 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474537037037 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.889146342 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.095238095 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216335142023 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767941842503 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567653500498 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1533078546 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377794417311 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.