By and large, the complexity of modern societies in which we live has placed a massive amount of pressure on young people to find the most efficient way of success since the opportunities seem to come around difficultly. There are a plethora of people who are in the conviction that it is essential for youngsters to promote e sense of planning and be more organized, while others take a radically different point of view and disagree. To the extent that my personal perspective is concerned, I accord with the first group. Among countless reasons which give adherence to my opinion, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, life nowadays consists of a complicated web of relationships and interactions and lacking the ability to plan and organize will definitely make the situation more complex. Opportunities seem to be few in regard to population and an array of intrinsic and extrinsic factors can easily take them away. For example I had the privilege of working with professor Hassani a couple of years ago. He had put me in charge of Self compacting concrete and expected me to hand in an outline of the project to him in six months. Being unorganized and unaware, of the importance of a vivid plan to fulfill professor's requirements regarding the project, I failed to meet the deadline. The private company that was the sponsor of the project was so madly furious that decided to withdraw from the project, leaving us with no money to go on. Never had it crossed my mind that my poor planning would have such catastrophic results. Eventually I got fired and was suddenly known for my incompetence by all collogues.
Secondly, in the face of personal issues that my happen to anyone, possessing an ability of planning and being organized helps him to survive. If the main element of survival in the past, was to possess an ability not to be hunted or starved to death, nowadays it's the ability to plan and organize. Iran for example is lagging behind other well developed countries in the sense of technological advancements. This has happened due to its manager's incompetence to place a premium on planning and organizing. But after the election most of our country's decision is now being made by youngsters. This new generation of managers, all young in the sense of both experience and age, have promoted our condition through their exceptional sense of planning. Now we are keeping abreast of other well developed countries as our youngsters have enables us to do so.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons and explanations leads to the conclusion that it's of importance for youngsters to possess the ability to plan and organize. Seizing opportunities and keeping abreast of modern life is two main reasons which adhere this status.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is much easier for people to achieve success without their family members’ help now than in the past? 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...be hunted or starved to death, nowadays its the ability to plan and organize. Iran ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in short, by and large, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92796610169 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93210541621 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536016949153 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1970204557 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.761904762 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214492817986 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566646396781 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383286116657 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131973298194 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210453608839 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.