Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Website.
Nowadays human beings are surrounded by electronic devices connected to the Internet which provide all variety of functions. A heated discussion arouses about whether educating children is getting difficult than before due to the exceeding time spent on cell phones, online games and social networking websites. From my point of view, such concern is not necessary.
Initially, devices present parental preference to limit the usage of them. Technology companies have taken many situations into account including the over use by kids. If parents are worried about children indulged in phones, they can open the setting window and all the limitations are showing on the screen. The devices provide the limit of using time, categories of application installment. Just a few click and with the protection of password personally made, parents are liberated from the concern.
Educational softwares are becoming more interesting for children to use. Admittedly, the past computer games were an indeed appealing way of entertainment. However, at present, in the application market companies are also offering all sorts of softwares designed for all ages of kids to learn different subject. Just carry an iPad in the school bag and the children may access to a broad range of information the teacher requires to search for. Some Math-learning apps are designed with a few funny game within. If a little kid manages to catch all the right apples printed with certain number dropping from the equation tree, the kid will be awarded a shining star, which may offer a great sense of achievement.
Teachers and parents can keep in touch with children through social networking applications. In the old days, contacting to the teacher was a troublesome matter. Parents had to spare the suitable time to attend the meeting at school. After the meeting a bunch of people crowded in front of the teacher inquiring about the progress their kids had made. However, the present social networking websites and applications facilitates both teachers and parents to communicate at any time. Meanwhile, all the questions asked by the children will be transferred to the teacher, after which teachers may answer instantly as well.
Once put into good use, the technology is no longer to be blame for the education of children.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Website. 80
- TPO49 81
- TPO35 voynich 80
- TPO27 Little Ice Age 80
- tpo33 carved stone balls 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun click seems to be countable; consider using: 'few clicks'.
Suggestion: few clicks
...ries of application installment. Just a few click and with the protection of password per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'searching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: searching
...nge of information the teacher requires to search for. Some Math-learning apps are design...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e time to attend the meeting at school. After the meeting a bunch of people crowded i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 43.0788530466 9% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22371967655 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80096061621 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590296495957 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.218094764 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.45110844103 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147016108437 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432792316125 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528063306226 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081528129611 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376061903193 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.