Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
Education, one of the most important thing for parents, triggers heated discussion over whether it is difficult to educate children than before. Educating kids, in some people's view, is harder nowadays because children spend a plethora of time on cell phone and other entertainments. On the contrary, my perspective is that teaching kids is easier than decades ago because of the following reasons.
First, never should we ignore that, with the development of technology, it is effortless for children to acquire expertise compared with in the past, reducing the workload of parents and teachers. To begin with, by using the search engine, children can find the useful knowledge on their own. After typing in the queries into the search engine, they will be presented with assorted information related to their question. As a result, it is not necessary for them to refer to their parents or teachers. Besides, on the internet, students are able to have access to unlimited resources from social networking website. For instance, on the forums or Twitter, students are able to meet with established professors or experts who are not available in the past. Teenagers can exchange ideas with these people and get instructions when they confront some difficulties. However, in the past, what kids can do exclusively in such situation is to inquire teachers, which will make the them feel exhausted.
In addition, what should be highlighted is that the digital devices, such as cell phone or computer, can serve as a teaching tool in the classroom, making it less arduous to impart knowledge. To be more specific, teachers can adpot some pedegogical approaches regarding the electronic devices. For example, during the class, the teacher can direct students to visit some websites, or search some useful facts or background information, or view some related illustrations and videos. As a result, students will gain a deeper and comprehensive understanding of what the teacher is talking, which is definitely more effective than old teaching method.
Admittedly, in the contemporary time, some teenagers are indulged in games, due to the lack of supervision from parents. But even if without the cell phones or computers, teenagers is also likely to be addicted to other entertainments, such as playing cards or toys. Parents should attach more significance on encouraging students to enjoy learning and restrict the time they spend on entertainments disregarding the type of the entertainments.
In conclusion, educating children is not onerous than it was in the past because nowadays children can get access to information easily and the new technology improves the teaching efficiency.
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood the area where they live than now 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 80
- TPO40 Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think it is a good idea 76
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 972, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...is to inquire teachers, which will make the them feel exhausted. In addition, what sh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32318501171 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00984969577 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538641686183 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.927388074 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.631578947 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212058377208 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620439820764 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582269414761 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133337952038 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068380098609 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.