Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leadership, the foundation of the team working, has been valued and triggers heated discussion on whether it comes naturally. The competence of being a leader, in some people's view, is obtained with born and can not be learned. On the contrary, my perspective is that leadership doesn't come naturally and people are able to learn it.
To begin with, never should we ignore that the essential abilities, required by the leader, can be acquired and practiced. First, the ability to make the team members work together can be obtained by learning from successful leaders. By referring to other leaders face-to-face or on the internet, a person, who wants to guide a team, may learn how to maintain the relationship between team members harmonious. For instance, a sensible way is to involve all the team members in the decision-making process so that they can exchange ideas with each other. In the whole process, they become familiar with other and gradually establish intimate relationships, and thus the whole team will be more likely to collaborate well. Besides, a leader can also be taught to accept the opinions from subordinates instead of being stubborn with his own idea. Specifically, if a superior in a team always sticks to his opinion and commits many mistakes, he will gradually realizes that listening to other's opinion can help revise the possible errors he ignored. Then he will not be stubborn as before and lead the team to achieve success. Admittedly, these abilities or characteristics above can be acquired naturally, but one can also learn to be a leader by imitating others or learning lessons from his own experience.
In addition, being a leader not only requires vital skills, but also demands some professional expertise, which can only be learned after born. It is well acknowledged that a good leader should have a clear mind about what the whole team should do both in the short-term and long-term. For example, in order to lead a research team on autonomous driving, an executive should make a time schedule and set milestones for the whole team, so that the individuals in this team will have a precise goal they will fight for. This knowledge of managing a professional team is a huge engineer and should be learned systematically. Besides, a leader should also understand the professional knowledge background of each member. Only in this way can this leader assign specific tasks to each member in order to lead the whole team to accomplish the research on autonomous cars. For example, he may ask some of the subordinates to research machine learning regarding cameras equipped on the vehicle, and assign some members to study the path planning algorithms. However, these expertise regarding managing and the knowledge background of the team members is definitely impossible to obtain by nature. Only by learning these diligently can a leader have a comprehensive understanding of the whole group and the future direction of the team.
In conclusion, leadership seldom comes naturally since one will be onerous to lead a team without relevant professional knowledge. One can become a successful leader by learning basic skills and proficiency.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 85
- TPO 37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage TPO40 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other ha 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses Which of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why 1 Find a roommate that can share the living expenses 2 Buy the new technology products less frequently 3 Shop for less expensive food 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rary, my perspective is that leadership doesnt come naturally and people are able to l...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 958, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'realize'
Suggestion: realize
...ommits many mistakes, he will gradually realizes that listening to others opinion can he...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 891, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...utonomous cars. For example, he may ask some of the subordinates to research machine learni...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 945, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to regard'.
Suggestion: to regard
...bordinates to research machine learning regarding cameras equipped on the vehicle, and as...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1060, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this expertise' or 'these expertises'?
Suggestion: this expertise; these expertises
... the path planning algorithms. However, these expertise regarding managing and the knowledge ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 9.8082437276 265% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2668.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94921613969 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478927203065 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2826025233 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6956521739 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08695652174 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176559671135 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685434229197 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475805819307 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152082524452 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496121555254 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.