Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I agree that the world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past. However, by learning the past, we could still prevent similar mistakes and replicate previous success in decision making nowadays.
It is true that the world today is more complex than before. For example, when choosing a major when entering university, students will face a challenge because of a plethora of information and more diversified majors. To begin with, with the advent of internet, students are provided with plenty of information; as a result, when they are considering what major to choose, they could search on the internet, but after they glean all the information, they will find it difficult to extract the information that are useful for them. Besides, since many field have been developed rapidly, there are many new majors each year and the boundaries between different field is less and less clear. As a result, with the development of technology, the world is definitely become more complex.
However, even if the world is changing quickly and become more complex, we can still prevent making mistakes when knowing about the past. Take the example of choosing major again. When making decisions, we may be informed about the cases who choosing a major according to whether it is lucrative insteat of whether he is interested in such field. We will, as a result, understand that even if in such a field most people could locate rewarding and promising career, without interests and passion, we will not be dedicated to learning and thus less likely to achieve supreme academic performance and hunt for a good occupation. Therefore, Kowning about the bad outcome of the examples in the past can exclude us from making wrong decisions.
In addition to preventing us from wrong choices, knowing about the past also help people repeat the right decision. When choosing a major, we are able to know what we are interested in and what we are good at according to the academic performance in the past. If we could know the history of students in the universities who have similar performance, we will be able to predict what major is better for us.
In conclusion, although the world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past, learning the past could still distract us from committing similar mistakes and replicate previous success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-31 | Aashu_Mehta | 75 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | Aashu_Mehta | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | Tanvayee15 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | Adefisoye | 66 | view |
- TPO47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were 70
- TPO40 Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think it is a good idea 76
- TPO 48 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career job would lead to a secure successful future TPO39 Task2 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fields'.
Suggestion: many fields
...hat are useful for them. Besides, since many field have been developed rapidly, there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to major'
Suggestion: to major
... the past. Take the example of choosing major again. When making decisions, we may be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00997506234 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69738993533 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463840399002 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4414096559 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5625 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 5.21951772744 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23854225057 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112020048367 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133763577099 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187430133345 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115870198943 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.