Nowadays, education is one of the most crucial aspects of every society. In this regard, the government attempts to invest money in whether the education of young children or universities. Some politicians believe that spending money on universities is more important than investment in schools but others look from a different lens. From my perspective, investment in schools would have beneficial consequences for society. I will elaborate my opinion on the following reasons.
First and foremost, schools require new methods and equipment in order to learn children basic knowledge. Young boys and girls intent to play games and have fun due to their metabolisms. A few numbers of children pay attention to learn new things and study by themselves. Most of them come to school just for being with their friends and playing games. Therefore, schools need to provide learning methods which they are not only amusing for children but also improve their knowledge. Providing such methodologies need financial support from governments.
The second reason is that young children should understand basic knowledge in order to be successful in universities. If schools do not learn students basic knowledge perfectly, students will face many problems in the future especially in the universities. Hence, governments should provide the best teachers and learners for students in schools. For instance, one of my classmates at the university, Sahar, did not figure out mathematics problems. Although she really studied and did her best, she never could take high score. After that, I realized that she never had a nice mathematics teacher at the school. Often, the government does not support schools and it would have bad effects on students’ future lives.
To put it briefly, I believe that investment in the education of young persons plays a crucial rule in every society. Not only schools need innovation methods to learn students but also students need to improve their basic knowledge. If the government pays more attention to schools, pleasant consequences would arise.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 70
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task 66
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, hence, if, look, really, second, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38226299694 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89221305112 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4503383205 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8095238095 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5714285714 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188844192394 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556164412328 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550926184305 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115813839101 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674952485098 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.