Nowadays, Automobiles are becoming more essential vehicles among people. It makes transport more available and easy. Everyone is using cars as a daily transition. In my view, there is no possibility to reduce the number of cars will be fewer after twenty years than two for two reasons.
The main reason is that cars are the main vehicle as public or personal transportation because its price is decreasing according to the development of technology. In the modern age, cars are available everywhere at a low price than the previous time. In addition, people are becoming richer and they want more comfortable transport to make their life easier. For example, in my office, most of my colleagues are buying cars for them after their wage increment. They are earning more money and ease their transportation by buying cars. As we can see that if this will be going to happen regularly then there is a very low possibility to decrease the number of cars.
Another reason is that using personal cars will help to save traveling time to everywhere. If someone uses one's own vehicle, it will save some time. Because it is time-consuming to use public transport for traveling. One may fail to attend an emergency meeting because of being late. Even you can't ensure the availability of public transportation. So, everyone who is able to buy a car will buy one. For instance, my neighbor bought a car because once he lost a job for being late to attend a meeting. He used to use public transport to go to work. Now he is using his personal cars so that he will able to go everywhere in time. This example demonstrated that there is a huge possibility to increase the number of automobiles in the near future.
In sum, some may agree that there will be fewer cars in twenty years that today, but there is no possibility to happen this. Not only people will buy cars for low cost but also for saving time
- TOEFL T P O 12 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 45- independent writing taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use s 70
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 73
- TPO 38 Integrated writing 3
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...meeting because of being late. Even you cant ensure the availability of public trans...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70484469189 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497023809524 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2409987036 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2727272727 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250415018637 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788287044036 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705601602178 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171007660247 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058551451895 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.