Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time.
Many people think that working on multiple tasks and switching between them is a big mistake while the others believe doing the projects one by one has more disadvantages. I personally believe that doing several projects at the same time is not as efficient as doing projects one after the other. I have a myriad of remarkable reasons for my assertion three of which will be elaborated subsequently.
To begin with, comparing the productivity level between doing one project first and then begin to do another with doing multiple projects simultaneously illustrates that the former choice is much better. When people are forced to concentrate on different issues, the decrease in productivity can be seen. Therefore, it is better to finish a project completely and then set off a new project. That is because when people accept to do several projects at one time they have to consume a lot of time as well as energy in different fields of projects. In this situations, they have to work harder and put so much time on their jobs. Their rest time decreases and they cannot go on vacations as before due to achieve the good outcomes. For instance, managers who force their employee to work on several projects at the same time will face with lower efficiency and achievement in the future. In this organization, whole effort becomes a drag on moral and no trend that signifies the progress could be seen.
Another equally outstanding reason to be mentioned is that by doing multiple tasks, we cannot expect the work-penchant increases. By and large, people who take several projects are good at the starting level, but after a while, due to tremendous tasks to be done they will lose their interest, and finally, be frustrated to finish them. Everybody has a specified ability, therefore, putting them on the pressure in order to do several projects, resulting in an opposite way. They become disappointed step by step and eventually their interest wanes. My uncle's experience is a compelling example of this issue, he worked for a civil organization. During the time, he was working there, his manager forced him to work on several projects. After a while, because of great volumes of work which should be done solitary, he lost his interest, and consequently, the chief manager of the firm decided to fire him. This is why I think that it is better to focus on one single task; since the more tasks you are supposed to do the more incentives you need to continue the work, and as a logical result it would be less probable to finish the job successfully.
To make long story short, having discussed the topic from two controversial point of views, and having into account all of the points, examples, it is fair to say that attend to implement multiple jobs is not beneficiary since not only does it reduces the efficiency of workers, but also it absolutely will result in lack of interest regarding the topic. All in all, it is predicted that companies will reform their fashions to not to devote some diverted jobs to one employee at one time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to understand to use the land for human needs such as farming, housing, and industry than to save it for endangered animals. 90
- TPO20 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should assign homework for students every day. 60
- task 1 12
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people think that working on multip...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich will be elaborated subsequently. To begin with, comparing the productivit...
^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rgy in different fields of projects. In this situations, they have to work harder an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignifies the progress could be seen. Another equally outstanding reason to be...
^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an opposite way" with adverb for "opposite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...order to do several projects, resulting in an opposite way. They become disappointed step by step ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to finish the job successfully. To make long story short, having discuss...
^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...point of views, and having into account all of the points, examples, it is fair to say tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduce'?
Suggestion: reduce
... not beneficiary since not only does it reduces the efficiency of workers, but also it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduce'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: reduce
... not beneficiary since not only does it reduces the efficiency of workers, but also it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, as well as, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81939163498 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72738692147 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6314863278 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0476190476 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37184066849 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116574347999 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152154601858 0.0737576698707 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239025935514 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145874841425 0.0645574589148 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.