The global village is a concept which has been proposed by socialist and the economists through the recent decade in terms of the affiliation and very tight connectivity that the technology has brought up for us these years. It means sometimes reaching out to the news and events which are already happening in the world is inevitable and you can't eschew to know about other folks on your planet! Admittedly, I acknowledge the magnitude of knowing about the happenings in the world due to the following statements which I want to elaborate.
First and foremost, the economic situation in the world is somehow predictable and by perceiving the routine of the investments in the capital countries you will find the way which you are better to invest your money. For instance, I knew many solemn investors in my country which is Iran who always follows the breaking news of Wall street stock market in New York to just determine the greater entrepreneurs' ideas in their business even though their New York stock market rarely might hit my country's economic circumstances. As the matter of the fact, getting priceless knowledge about various criteria is the most important outcome of following world's new.
Additionally, there are many subjects that we can absorb from each other even they won't affect us directly. For instance, the recent Tornados in southern America was a remarkable example for me. The way that country managed the critical situation in that moment, the global reaction toward that catastrophic disaster and the following circumstances was replete with the outstanding notions. On the other hand, for months later a destructive earthquake shook the west of my country, Kermanshah province and as the result, thousands of people have been expired, and most of the population have gotten homeless. The most noticeable difference of this disaster versus the Catrina Tornado was the poor crisis management of the government which has led the victims' lives to the chaotic position. That was the big shock for me since I understood the genuine caliber of my country in such controls.
All in all, the mentioned arguments lead us to the conclusion that we are getting closer every day by the paramount role of technology and that is fabulous since we all can uptake many new notions by other countries advancements or even the fiascos. I recommend all people spend just half an hour in a day to grasp more familiarity about world's novelties and vicissitudes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Describe one of the most important days in your life and why it was so important to you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 76
- Independent TOEFL essay - TPO 9: Agree or disagree? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ning in the world is inevitable and you cant eschew to know about other folks on you...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04634146341 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78713902809 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1368984655 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.153846154 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5384615385 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184677063218 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596665561919 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676305291665 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105871826978 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600997288372 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.