A glance at people attitude toward events around the world brings to the light a question that has provoked a debate several times, namely, whether we should notice every events happening around the world or not. In my opinion, as a foreign immigrate to USA, all of us are part of a huge society which we call humanity. Although some people believe that they have their own responsibilities to work on, I assert that we should devote some part of our life to understand the situations of other people.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that we live in a global village that has butterfly effects which simply means that even flying an insect can cause a flood in the other side of the world. For example, the first world war started from Spain, which people considered it unimportant. As a matter of fact, the fire of fight spread all over the universe and nobody could control it. Therefore, every thing that happens around the world has an impact on our life.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that individuals are not able to change the conditions without union. For instance, if people in the France are striking to raise their income, citizens of Canada must show their respect to this attempt. On the other hand, if Saudi Arabia government kills some of opponents, we have to declare our opposition. Moreover, if we assist other citizens, it is more likely they aid us whenever we need. Hence, people can improve the environment if they take every events serious and do not concentrate on their own tasks.
Admittedly, every day we hear a lot of different news that we cannot respond to all of them. A person has limited time and must solve many problems in the real life. Nevertheless, the social media facilitate it for us to get the newest information and show our feelings, so even one click can increase the rate of disapproval and alter the laws. A study at Harvard University, department of psychology, shows that politicians check the Twitter and Facebook to understand people comments and will change their mind if they see people disagree.
Due to aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I strongly recommend my friends to follow news and know that indifference is not helpful.
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 80
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking courses Give specific examples and details to support your answer 90
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one of the mo 80
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the opponents') or simply say ''some opponents''.
Suggestion: some of the opponents; some opponents
... hand, if Saudi Arabia government kills some of opponents, we have to declare our opposition. Mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78680203046 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63354930705 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6349294656 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.941176471 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138886674242 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418310867832 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403849702376 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750594891066 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027738020861 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.