Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support

Regular work schedules give only two free days for workers. However, if there is the possibility to work fewer days even though it implies work extra time, workers will have time to do extra activities. Moreover, workers tend to be more effective when they do the same activity for more hours. It is because workers begin to focus on their activity, and they finish it quickly. I believe that it would be a good idea to work 3 days rather than 5 or 6 because this way workers will enjoy more their free time and can be more effective in doing their job.

To begin with, working fewer days will provoke workers to have extra free time when they end their project. Actors are a great example of the previously mentioned. Regularly, if they are filming a movie they can work for long periods doing the same scene. If they did not love their job, they would not accept to work overtime. Although some people may argue that it is better to work every time the same amount of time, actors indeed enjoy a long vacation after finishing their movie. This is because, when people love what they do, they can work many hours and do not hesitate about that, and then they can finish more quickly and enjoy their free time.

Secondly, when workers do the same activity for a long period, they become experts doing what they do. Online teachers are a great example of that. If people needed to work 5 or 6 days per week, online teachers would not exist. What they regularly do is working 1 or 2 days per week for long hours. One class can spend 6 hours, but the reality is that their classes are very effective. Students tend to learn more quickly rather than in regular classes. This is because students spend a long time learning, and when the class ends, they have plenty of time to study and ask doubts in the next session.

To sum up, it is wise to work for a few days, because this way people can have more free time. Finally, people can be a lot more effective than following a traditional work schedule.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... two free days for workers. However, if theres the possibility to work fewer days even...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more effective in doing their job. To begin with, working fewer days will p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...g periods doing the same scene. If they didnt love their job, they wouldnt accept to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ene. If they didnt love their job, they wouldnt accept to work overtime. Although some ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t they do, they can work many hours and dont hesitate about that, and then they can ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e quickly and enjoy their free time. Secondly, when workers do the same activ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...k 5 or 6 days per week, online teachers wouldnt exist. What they regularly do is workin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'One class', 'a class', or simply 'class'?
Suggestion: One class; A class; Class
...ng 1 or 2 days per week for long hours. One class can spend 6 hours, but the reality is t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and ask doubts in the next session. To sum up, it is wise to work for a few ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48626373626 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13436433389 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450549450549 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7384088165 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.65 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254252111542 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990418632411 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649916803746 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183200134204 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301290161673 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.