Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of allocating budget on progressing internet inferastructures or public transportation has been discussed by many, and although some may argue that expanding internet network is more essential, I personally think that public transportation has still higher importance for some cogent reasons.
First of all, it should be considered that using the internet is not easy for all citizens, while public transportation facilities could be used by almost all kinds of people. For instance, elderly cannot work with a modern multi-functional cellphone to access the internet or to purchase their needs online. Furthermore, the annual budget and national resources are for all citizens of a country, and it is better to be spent on fields that is proper and helpful for everyone.
Second of all, a wide suitable public transportation could result in a reduction in driving personal cars in cities and air pollution as a dire consequence of that. Although nowadays individuals are able to do some parts of their daily works by phones and computers, yet so many people travel everyday for various purposes; so it is a compelling argument that budget and money should be invested by government to motivate people to use public transportation instead of their own car in order to decrease air contamination caused by cars.
On the other hand, recently some jobs promoted to the level that could be done by the internet at home and there is no need to travel a long distance to go to work, which eliminates the need for transportation. But still the majority of social vocations must be perform physically and by going to workplace.
In conclusion, improving the internet network is unavoidable for governments. Nonetheless, transportation modernization, building infrastructures like roads and increasing the number of public transportation vehicles such as buses and trains are at a higher priority because of accessibility for people in different ages, as well as the effect on deminishing air and other pollutions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 76
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nd computers, yet so many people travel everyday for various purposes; so it is a compel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2600619195 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27626157472 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1073286986 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.9 100.406767564 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.45110844103 294% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164424773897 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692970258054 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04670527527 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901001705959 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282818298206 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 11.7677419355 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.