Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Choosing between a pair of options always hard even for the governments. With emergence of internet all of businesses and aspect of personal lives has changed substancially. Taking advantages of internet need infrastructures to connect the computers to the network. Often this expenses are very high and government should decide to trade off between the sections that they spend money. On the other hands there is lots of defects and issues in subway and other part of puplic transportation section. I believe that government should spend more money on publuc transporatation than internet access. I have several reasons for my asset which two of them are as follow:
First, I beilive that internet access has very good situation than subways and other puplic transportation facilitie. These days almost every one even in the very small village in the vicinity of borders have access to internet. The goal of the governments changed after connecting all the cities,towns and villages to the internet. Many new technologies has emerged in recent years and governments want to imporove their quality of internet with making contracts with high technology companies. The money that governments should pay for these equipments are by far more than the spend in some other necessary projects that need emergence support. One of which is public transportation system that in includes taxies, buses and subways. According to increasingly rate of migration to the large and mega cities this old system can not tolerate such a demand. With spending half of the money that government can spend on internet contracts they can repair whole transporation system.
Secondly, improving public transportation system can help to the health of the people indirectly. When more people don't use their cars for transporting they will consume less gasoline and as a result they would produce less pour less polution to the air. Additionally they can save their precious time when there would be no traffic in the streets. For example when i was student our municipality decided to improve our subway stations, as a result more people was attracted and convinced to use subways in theri daily transpormation.
To sum up, I pro that government should consider the more important and vital needs of its people so they should spend the public money on the projects that more people will take advantage of those so I believe that government should spend more money for public transportation projecs.
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some t 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lots'?
Suggestion: there are lots
...at they spend money. On the other hands there is lots of defects and issues in subway and oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...sons for my asset which two of them are as follow: First, I beilive that internet ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , towns
... changed after connecting all the cities,towns and villages to the internet. Many new ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... to the internet. Many new technologies has emerged in recent years and governments...
^^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r these equipments are by far more than the spend in some other necessary projects that n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the people indirectly. When more people dont use their cars for transporting they wi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...uce less pour less polution to the air. Additionally they can save their precious time when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 367, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...raffic in the streets. For example when i was student our municipality decided to...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20448877805 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87988359428 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511221945137 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0358001392 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.842105263 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287716068368 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836471230239 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692761660549 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173443295218 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449869851502 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.