Friends have a severe role in every persons’ life to such an extent that scientists believe, the most common behaviors of a person are retrieved from his closest friends. I totally disagree with that statement, says, conserving lifelong friends is more important than making new ones. This essay will demonstrate two reasons for this assertion in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it should be mentioned that, seldom have I seen a youth does not represent immense changes in his behaviors in comparison with the time that he was a teenager. These changes in his lifestyle make the old friends less desirable to contact with specially when no longer their hobbies match. For instance, I had a close friend in high school which she was also our neighbor. We had drifted apart for going to college. In the time we saw each other after a long period, we barely have common interests to talk about, because we both changed dramatically.
Furthermore, the way to success could got easily hampered by a lousy company. There is no doubt that, it is crucial to have a versatile person in our life. Choosing a diligent person as friend not only has undeniable beneficial effects on each persons life, but also could guided us to knowing better persons. This goal can not be achieved by spending all the time with persons who already we have known. For example, I owe knowing of a celebrated person to making new friends in the university.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons and example into account we can deduce that it is always better to find new friends instead of keep our old ones who may we do not anymore have anything in common with. Or, perhaps they are not good enough to keep with what we need as an instructive company.
- For success in school and work, the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or a field to study. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 60
- The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity 60
- work fast or carefully 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
... Furthermore, the way to success could got easily hampered by a lousy company. The...
^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s undeniable beneficial effects on each persons life, but also could guided us to knowi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'guide'
Suggestion: guide
...ts on each persons life, but also could guided us to knowing better persons. This goal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77227722772 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60827986933 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1289020938 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198691413303 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662934041854 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808810420244 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128487495468 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638221794038 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.