Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Making new or saving old friends have been always a place of debate among people in each society. There are a number of people who think that old friends must be saved forever, however, some others believe that making new friends are more exciting and rational. In my own perspective, I do believe that the first concept is more reasonable because of two reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, old friends are exactly like living memory, therefore, nobody wants to throw one part of his mind and previous life. All of us have numerous friend form our university periods with good and bad experiences but they are a part of our life and cannot be separated. My own experience is an interesting story. When I was studying at the university of New York, I had a roommate named Alex. We were always with each other and other students called us twins! This friendship continues for more than 10 years and the perfect part of it is that we are still in contact and get really long with each other. As a matter of fact, Alex in part of my life or even my character and it is not possible for me to neglect these amount of memories.
Secondly, hidden features of old friends start to appear step by step. In fact, few people reveal all their properties at the beginning of a relation. All human being are a little skeptical about their relations, as a result, we try to hide our real features from each other. An experimental investigation was carried out in my own country 3 years ago. It was a huge study to show whether people try to keep old friends or not. The results were surprisingly unbelievable. More than 85 percent of individuals, who take part in this survey, desire to protect their friends and avoid separation. The predominant reason for them was almost the same. They believe that by spending more time new features of friends will be observed. They also add that after some years we all know how to behave with each other and can be more helpful. This shows the value of the old friend.
In sum, above from aforementioned explanation, I do prefer that saving old friends seems more logical in comparison with making new ones. This is just because of the effect of time which result in better understanding and also being a part of our personal lives. That's why we should protect our old relations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should focus their budget more on environmental protection than on economic development 88
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 78
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...us life. All of us have numerous friend form our university periods with good and ba...
^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...lso being a part of our personal lives. Thats why we should protect our old relations...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60238095238 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55463985862 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530952380952 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0409244292 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0434782609 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2608695652 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205742943654 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607771368333 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544974068283 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143713719718 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434678665476 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.