Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, it is more important for governments to improve public transportation because improving public transportation could be a useful solution for a global crisis: climate change. Also, expanding urban areas have made the improvement of public transportation inevitable.
We are all aware of the harmful impacts of global warming on the Earth and species living on it. From air pollution and rising sea levels which are affecting human life to the ecology and populations of other species. The main cause of all these problems is the carbon dioxide emitting exhaust fumes of automobiles in municipal areas. The air pollution is a challenge for all citizens, especially those who have respiratory diseases whose health conditions could be exacerbated by increasing air pollution. However, the most efficient way to reduce pollution is improving and investment in public transportation. This section includes suburbs, buses, and public taxis. The more improved and availability of public vehicles, the less use of private cars by people and therefore the improved air quality and people's health conditions. In addition, the efficacy of such policy could be reinforced if the government also invest in hybrid public vehicles which expel almost no harmful materials into the air.
Second, in all over the world, increasing population growth resulted in urbanization. Many people also migrate from rural areas to urban areas due to climate change which led to a reduction in agricultural yields. Consequently, the extended urban areas need new infrastructures for new dwellers who are seeking good living conditions. The new and grown population could be considered as an opportunity for the economy if the facilities would be provided for them. The most important facility and infrastructure is public transportation. If they would be able to commute for a place to place, they could be employed as labor in industry and public services. By contrast, if the facilities would not be provided by the governments, the population may create social concerns and may increase the rate of crimes as a result of unemployment.
All in all, I believe that it more important for governments to improve public transportation instead of improving internet access. If public transportation would not have been improved, many environmental and social problems may arise in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-25 | Raed Mudawar | 73 | view |
- TPO 41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 50Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and detailsto support your response. 80
- TPO 51Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38440860215 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13690557875 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9298331277 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.421052632 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198146683984 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687880770976 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087542425343 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158820413621 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751072888848 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.