I disagree with this statement. I don't think this statement is very good, because it is not true. I don't think this is true, because it is very possible to become a leader even if you were shy in the past. Another reason is because you can learn to become a leader.
I think you don't have to be born with leadership, because it is very possible to become a leader even if you were shy in the past. One example of this is my friend. He used to be extremely shy, and timid. Now, he is loud, and speaks in a way that sounds like a leader. You can experience different things as you grow up, that leads you to become a leader.
Secondly, you can learn to become a leader. Many people learn to become leaders, because of their hobbies, or certain events. One example that I have encountered was when I played soccer. I became one of the leaders, and told other people on my team what to do. Soccer taught me how to become a leader. Events that make you speak up and talk, can make you into a person who can show leadership
You can become a person with leadership, even without being born with it. You can eventually grow up to become a person with leadership, or even learn to have it. You do not have to be technically born into a person with good command.
- Adapted from Eric Klinenberg Viewpoint Air Conditioning Will Be the End of Us 2013 by Time Inc Originally published July 17 2013 1 Earlier this week as the temperature in New York City hit the upper 90s and the heat index topped 100 my utility provider is 51
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 3
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 75
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 80
- As you read the passage below, consider how Christopher Hitchens uses • evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims. • reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence. • stylistic or persuasive elements, 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I disagree with this statement. I dont think this statement is very good, beca...
^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t is very good, because it is not true. I dont think this is true, because it is ...
^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...is very good, because it is not true. I dont think this is true, because it is very ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...arn to become a leader. I think you dont have to be born with leadership, becaus...
^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h leadership, or even learn to have it. You do not have to be technically born into...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 1977.66487455 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22727272727 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30347717665 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 212.727598566 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438016528926 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9074901987 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.1764705882 100.406767564 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.2352941176 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94117647059 5.45110844103 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267856565916 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106897308103 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560437898202 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182855037853 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222529783747 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.6 11.7677419355 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.66 10.9000537634 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.83 8.01818996416 73% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 86.8835125448 26% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.