Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
How to be a leader has been a hot point in society, which is invested by different people with different opinions: leadership that is considered born to some is not agreed by others that people can learn how to be a manager. As far as I am concerned, leadership is not coming naturally while it depends on other significant factors.
First of all, the gift is not the decisive factor to leadership. It is easy to see that those people have suffered numbers of difficulties and learnt from others more before becoming managers of well-known companies. During the process, they have learnt how to manage the work well or have a good talk with others, which is necessary for a leader. It is true that some are born with strong leadership, we cannot ignore other necessary features that must be cultivated during their working about being a leader. Thus, gift is to leadership as the types of flowers which beauty is not decided by their kind completely.
Secondly, it may not explain well by above and something else should be taken into consideration. Something is that we should also focus on different tasks required different field of knowledge to lead. There are fewer people to choose management as their major, that is not because they regard leadership as born with. That is because they now know what kind of knowledge can help them to make decision about their special industries before they becoming a leader. For example, there is a difference between managing a school or managing a company.
In conclusion, it is cannot be a great assertion that leadership is coming naturally. That is because not only leadership not only depends on gift but also different managing style requires different fields of knowledge.
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 78
- Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the originalbook before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book.Which one do you prefer? 60
- It is better for people to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends in your same age 60
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71096970649 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0374623841 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166210748151 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642446495721 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06870073591 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115971884482 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429607660872 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.