Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Travelling is one of the best ways to gain pleasure and knowledge either it foreign or domestic. However, a plethora of people contents that travelling in the domestic country is more beneficial than the foreign country. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I personally believe travelling to a foreign country is more essential. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound in subsequent followings.
To commence with, visiting in a foreign place I can easily experience a different environment. Moreover, experiencing a new place, culture, tradition, different food, life-style is really enjoyable. Besides, the various historical place also increases our knowledge which is not possible in domestic travel. We already know about this stuff and not appealing us like the new place. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. A few years ago, I went to the USA in California in winter. Thus, I experienced snowfall which I never saw in my country because I am from a warmer country. It was really nostalgia for me and also tried various native food which was completely new for me. Therefore, in my country
Furthermore, one could gain experience by communicating with different kind of people. In the world, people talk with various language and communicating with them with other language is very fascinating. Moreover, within one country people can talk in various local language which is one of the most pleasuring scenes. For instance, I experience a lot in my last year travelling to India. I was surprised by their various language and almost twenty-seven different languages they talk. Moreover, the language is very well established and different states have one local language but the national language is Hindi. Therefore, I experienced a lot and which was possible for travelling to a foreign country.
To recapitulate, I am on the opinion that travelling in a foreign country is really valuable because we can easily gather many experiences by exploring a new place, idea, meeting with the new people.
- tpo 55Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of propos 3
- TPO43 75
- tpo 30A little over 2200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to f 78
- Tpo11A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and 85
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely new for me. Therefore, in my country Furthermore, one could gain experience b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24778761062 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09500122016 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7822026022 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7142857143 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187668439122 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601605512411 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568645468141 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121676764166 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495779790389 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.