Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Playing sports teaches people important lessons about life.
There are some moot points about whether playing sports can learn people lessons of life or not. The question of positive aspects of playing sports has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it came to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that playing sports can give us some lessons about life. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of that will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that each sport has their own rules if we follow those rules we would be a win in that game and if we do not follow that we would be lost. Therefore, with knowing the truth rules and confirming that law we can be successful. Our life is the same as the games and has many rules consequently we can obey this law and be prosper in our life. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a high school student my father learned me to play chess, he claimed that chess lead to I could make the best decision in the problematic situation. Now I find out that my father assertion was true because in the hard conditions I can make the best decision. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that some sports can learn us valuable things that will be very useful for our future.
By the same token, another paramount reason is that one of the significant aspects of exercise class in the schools is this course instructs precious things to students. Children in that age have not any vision toward team working and contribution but some sports in the sports course learn them this aspect. My personal experience demonstrates this reality when I was a student, I had not any knowledge about team working and alliance hence, in the sports class our teachers learned us this concept with a football game. He encouraged us to choose a team and assisted each other to make a goal although, at the beginning of competitions, we disobey of that rules after some lose we decided to cooperate more and more and this action ameliorate our teamwork and learned us worth things. My personal experience shed some light on the point that sports are very instructive for our life.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that sports can learn us valuable lessons about our life. These games not only will instruct many rules but also will prepare us for future life.
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 73
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to relax through watching a film and reading a book than doing physical exercises? 76
- A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? 73
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 55
- TPO50 -Integrated task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
... about whether playing sports can learn people lessons of life or not. The question of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62237762238 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57051328291 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480186480186 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4345185705 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.647058824 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181603363404 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720640693874 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745339957669 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135686607891 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722128123109 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.