Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Reading is more educational than watching movies or TV.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading is more educational than watching movies or TV.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Knowledge is required for the human being in order to keep on the right track of modern developed world. Even though some people think reading is the effective way to earn information, others believe that using the visual technology nowadays as television, cinema shows, and youtube programs through the internet would be a useful resource to obtain worthy educational. According to me, I tend to support watching T.V and movies exhibitions rather than reading. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
At first, movies could be so helpful to learn a second language easily, the foreign movies give the people attractive, an appealing opportunity to gather new phrases and vocabularies, which could be used in a daily basis. Furthermore, having an enjoyable time at the same time, contrary to the traditional way of learning a new language through boring, dull and thick books. For example, I am an Arabic native speaker and when I decided to learn English I spent a valuable time with different kinds of American cinema shows, watching and learning how to pronounce words fluently, in addition, entertainment myself. That was a whole package of benefits for me indeed.
secondly, by watching television documentaries people could build a great knowledge of subjects, that they interested in fully, to be more specific T.V illustrate the material visibly and audibly manner for free, while books could be difficult to find or even expensive, as a result, they would be inaccessible to most people. For instance, when I was a teenager, I was charmed in the wild animal world. I had a passion to recognize their innate habits and behaviors so, I was sincerely subscribing all programs on the national geographic channel on the television and youtube, which provided trusted shows and reports.
To sum up, I disagree that reading has a superior value in the learning process over than visual media like cinema or television. That is because I think this media provides both knowledge and fun, so, it would be the most desirable way to get an education for folks in general.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-16 Sanfre011 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ola100 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... resource to obtain worthy educational. According to me, I tend to support watching T.V and mov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...ing to me, I tend to support watching T.V and movies exhibitions rather than read...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...le package of benefits for me indeed. secondly, by watching television documentaries p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...erested in fully, to be more specific T.V illustrate the material visibly and aud...
^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to find or even expensive, as a result, they would be inaccessible to most peopl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in addition, in general, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00283286119 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79662949191 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592067988669 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.2172920055 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.846153846 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 5.45110844103 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116474201745 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407197977062 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459628021091 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715378178204 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307620764816 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.