Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
It is better to study alone than in a group
Use specific reasons and examples to support your oppinion
Some people argue that studying alone is more productive and better way than studying in a group. However, I firmly belive that studying with other students is more preferable method than studying alone and my view can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below. First, group members can provide us an opportunity to have a broader perspective and moreover, group study can broaden one's human relationship.
To begin with, group members can provide a wide perspective that one can easily miss if he or she study alone. Studying a complex subject usually requires students to consider diverse aspects. However, studying alone may induce people to think only in a limited way. On the other hands, studying in group may provide students to think it with wider view as all people have all different views. To illustrate, I usually had studied alone when preparing tests as I thought group study is time wasting and ineffective and my grade was bad even though I studied really hard. One day, however, my best friend Lucy who was also a members of dean's list, recommanded me to study in group as it was truly helpful to maintain his superior grade. Following his recommendation, I studied in a group in next semester. As the group included students with diverse majors, it was able to provide me a broad way to access a problem. As a result, I finally got a superior score. Had it not been for group members, I would not have been able to get a 'A'.
Furthermore, concerning human relationship there is no better way than meeting people who share common goal frequently. As members in study group are likely to have common goal: getting an A, passing the exam, etc, group study can widen one's human network naturally. Like there is saying "It is who you know, not what you do that makes you succeed". The meaning of success has completely changed compared to the past. If it was merely focusing on one's own way and excelling others, not it is different. Along with your own ability, it is crucial to have people who can len you a hand when you are in trouble. In this sense, studying in group can be helpful. For example, I remember a couple of months ago I had a problem on my hand. As the problem required knowledges in law to be solved and I did not have enough knowledge in law, I was frustrated. However, I suddenly remembered a lawyer who I had met as a group member studying english together. I helplessly asked him to lend a hand and he sincerely helped me out. I could implement his advice right away and everthing was solved. Thanks to my group member, I was able to solve my crisis rather quickly.
In sum, group study can broaden one's perspective and can provide one an opportunity to enlarge a human network. Therefore, I believe that it is a better way to study in a group comparing to studying alone.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People should try different jobs before deciding a career 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Universities should spend as much money on sports as they do on libraries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'studies'.
Suggestion: studies
...e that one can easily miss if he or she study alone. Studying a complex subject usual...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a limited way" with adverb for "limited"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g alone may induce people to think only in a limited way. On the other hands, studying in group ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a member' or simply 'members'?
Suggestion: a member; members
...wever, my best friend Lucy who was also a members of deans list, recommanded me to study ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1031, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...bers, I would not have been able to get a A. Furthermore, concerning human relat...
^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al: getting an A, passing the exam, etc, group study can widen ones human network...
^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...kly. In sum, group study can broaden ones perspective and can provide one an oppo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, for example, you know, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6369047619 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65979530311 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480158730159 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5054609194 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4642857143 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241575967775 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073024357549 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607383753637 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173840364338 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036395496862 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.