The era of people who know everything and do everything passed. In recent years, by developing technology and science people prefer to focus a few things to master on it instead of mediocre on so many things. In my point of view, reasons are the followings in the manner of their priority: first new science and skills are very narrow down and need several days, months and even years to master on it. The next reason that 21st-century people busy with routine to-do lists that do not have time to do so various things. The last one is related to complicated nature of today’s science which need go to deep on it to become skillful at it.
Look at a long list of academic majors in universities show that skills and subject become magnificent specialize. In the fast-paced environment, people who professional in the specific subject of his career shine in their industry. Therefore, people tend to learn more things in few subjects vice versa to learn general things in all related subjects. For example in project management profession, managers have a tendency to learn the specific industry. Knowing general things in all industries do not know help project managers to become trustable in today complicated projects.
Taking care of children, shopping, paying bills and doing chores consume several hours of people `s time. They should do routine task and responsibilities every day as a role of parents or member of a family. Adding leisure time and sleeping hour to these tasks is enough to illustrate a lack of the time to do so many things. For instance, I as father and spouse have the responsibility to my wife and son. Spending time to handle related tasks do not leave any time to do my all favorite things, so I decide to priories my list of subject and spend my time to become skilled in my top priorities.
Upcoming advancement in science force scientist to study deeply in one subject. In ancient times, philosophers study in manifold subject like stars, medicine, art and architecture which it is meaningless for today `s people, because people study in just one specific subject in the career for years to advance it just a little more. In other words, scientists focus on one study field to move forward the edge of knowledge for one step. Therefore, there is no time for research on the different area and this attitude does not support in today experiences.
To sum up, humankind move to specialize everything in every aspect of their life so this lifestyle need people to spend their time on few things instead of many things in different angel. Time-consuming to master on subject, being busy with routine job and necessarily comprehensive studying in complicated today `s science are reasons of this lifestyle.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The Reading-Listening-Writing Integrated Task 3
- TPO 38 Integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a professional'.
Suggestion: who is a professional
.... In the fast-paced environment, people who professional in the specific subject of his career s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to general'
Suggestion: to general
...ngs in few subjects vice versa to learn general things in all related subjects. For exa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91452991453 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7793880934 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7559266525 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.523809524 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282557136513 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833343587017 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813819260808 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152807095116 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818724427558 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.