A few years ago, many people lazy to talk about politics especially students. They know that politics is just for elites and full of corruption. However, thanks to the internet, right now politics can be discussed by everyone else. So I agree that students have more interest in politics right now than in the past. I hold this opinion for three reasons.
First of all, politicians believe that students are potential voters. So the politicians brand their image as young people and will make the students have interest to choose them. Moreover, there are many campaign in the social media which most its users is students. The students will like to talk about politics because they see some attractive campaign in the instagram. For instance, in the last gouverner election, one of the candidate make a campaign video that parody one film. In the next day, me and my friends talk it in the class.
Second, many college make politics class is a mandatory course for the students. Somehow that make the student, whether they are interest or not, has to learn about politics. They have to talk or conduct research for their paper project with latest politics situation. For instance, in my university, I and my friends has to presentation about international politics. At the first time, we are not really like the project but as the time goes by we prefer talk about politics project when we hang out.
In conclusion, students show some enthusiasm with the politics recenty. It occured because of internet and mandatory course.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun campaign seems to be countable; consider using: 'many campaigns'.
Suggestion: many campaigns
...est to choose them. Moreover, there are many campaign in the social media which most its user...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'campaigns'?
Suggestion: campaigns
...o choose them. Moreover, there are many campaign in the social media which most its user...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...onduct research for their paper project with latest politics situation. For instance, in my...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, really, second, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 259.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9305019305 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55935342381 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.632326929 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.9444444444 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3888888889 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230053438737 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764722289264 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101831341894 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147429213698 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710939162663 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.