Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As time goes by, the value of human society change drastically compared to what it was hundreds of years ago. The social restriction imposed among young adults become vague or even disappear. This article will explore why the society nowadays is a place with fewer rules which young adults have to follow.
First of all, as the development of technology and discovery of significant scientific theory, human beings become knowing the world better, we understand the causal inference of hydrologic cycle and the secret of gravity. With the power of knowledge, mysterious rules and actions which teenagers must obey centuries ago and were created for the purpose of explaining disaster were abandoned. People no longer see those ritual ceremony as a way to explain everything that they are not able to understand. For example, in the 15th centuries, there was a traditional culture in China that those who at the age of 20 must keep the length their hair below ears drops because local people believe that it would irritate the god of famine which actually resulted from irrigation technique. Apparently, they are liberated from the myth and the restriction in the 20th centuries because of the advanced knowledge human being posses nowadays.
Besides, with the advance of human society, parents nowadays are more rational and open to different kinds of value so their children are not expected to experts in traditional domain such as doctors or layers. For instance, parents in America would not stop his kids in college to pursuit a dream of becoming e-sport player who earn a great amount of fortune by streaming on social media platform such as Twitch, a world-wide platform for live game streaming. Human society and industry change a lot. There are many ways to success so it give many options to young adults compared what they had in the past. That being said, they do not have to obey certain rules or follow a specific path in this society.
In summary, the advance of technology and human society liberate young adults from the outdated rules and restrictions, providing more opportunities to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | sandeshbhandari2 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | marii.r67 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | shero | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | shero | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Seema Modak | 76 | view |
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 76
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 540, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...t. There are many ways to success so it give many options to young adults compared w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, besides, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06837606838 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6039636673 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578347578348 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2502984206 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144719295743 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531716325447 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596253166516 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934880519921 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339468308047 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.