Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
While some people may hold a view that the enhancement of educational system is related to professors' salaries; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that there are the other factors, which possess a crucial role in the improvement of the quality of education. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my idea is that the educational system of a university is practical based. Indeed, there is an alteration of the training system of school and university. Maybe the solo instructors' presentations are an adequate source for conveying the data. In contrast, in the university, other facilities such as a comprehensive library, well-equipped laboratory, or a high-tech computer hall are as important as the professors' function. In this case, solo investment in the Professors' incomes is an abortive action. According to two noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted at the University of Tabriz, there is approximately fifty-five percent increment in the quality of education system of Tabriz University, just by improvement of the educational facilities such as the library and laboratory; on the other hand, by increasing the professors' salaries, there is merely thirty-five enhancement in the education system. These two survey and their outcomes illustrate the importance of the other factors beyond the professors' earnings.
Another factor embraced my idea is that in the university, a student's activity is the basic factor of the better learning. It is explicit as a crystal that the training system in the university is student-base. Maybe in the school, teachers possess the fundamental impact in the learning process; on the contrary, in the university, the professors' influences are overshadowed; and students’ progress are important. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the issue is my own example. When I was a university student, I attended to different courses with the various professors. In whole classes the main element which guides the class progression was my performance in the class. Even in the class of a well-known professor, if I did not prepare for the class, his lecture was meaningless.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that the professors can be motivated by the money; and based on this motivation, they can teach better. However, they overlook this specific point that the learning system of a university is complicated and is shaped on the basis of various thing. In a case which a university is not well-equipped, or the students are from the middle level of intelligence; the professors' high salaries are meaningless; inasmuch as their efforts do not thrive well in the poor environment.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion the high salary is not a decent option to improve the education system; because other factors such as the students' intelligence and activities and learning facilities have the same importance as the professors' efforts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- tpo24.1 70
- TPO25 86
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to 66
- .The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' I 59
- Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookv 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ed my idea is that in the university, a students activity is the basic factor of the bet...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...stem; because other factors such as the students intelligence and activities and learnin...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263814616756 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.122994652406 0.158761421928 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.096256684492 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0356506238859 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030303030303 0.0685040099705 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0249554367201 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.2111189236 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0142602495544 0.0309702414327 46% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0017825311943 0.00188951952338 94% => OK
Determiners: 0.153297682709 0.0887237588012 173% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142602495544 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3169.0 2387.08602151 133% => OK
No of words: 502.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31274900398 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402390438247 0.338922669872 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332669322709 0.251872472559 132% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.262948207171 0.174417080927 151% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197211155378 0.112833075102 175% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2111189236 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496015936255 0.524397521467 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.2078238304 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9047619048 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.5138317592 48.84282405 181% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.904761905 120.699889404 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9047619048 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 57.1716941757 45.7405998639 125% => OK
Elegance: 2.16981132075 1.45489161554 149% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38804817136 0.300154397459 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121189241608 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0829312026764 0.0752933317313 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594266562203 0.497263757937 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164805862284 0.151897553556 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173579394802 0.114077575197 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536640134741 0.0781384742642 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.56679604072 0.336927656856 168% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0701236067655 0.067059652881 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287118698974 0.210909579961 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222789837618 0.0618886996521 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ed my idea is that in the university, a students activity is the basic factor of the bet...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...stem; because other factors such as the students intelligence and activities and learnin...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263814616756 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.122994652406 0.158761421928 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.096256684492 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0356506238859 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030303030303 0.0685040099705 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0249554367201 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.2111189236 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0142602495544 0.0309702414327 46% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0017825311943 0.00188951952338 94% => OK
Determiners: 0.153297682709 0.0887237588012 173% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142602495544 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3169.0 2387.08602151 133% => OK
No of words: 502.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31274900398 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402390438247 0.338922669872 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332669322709 0.251872472559 132% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.262948207171 0.174417080927 151% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197211155378 0.112833075102 175% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2111189236 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496015936255 0.524397521467 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.2078238304 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9047619048 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.5138317592 48.84282405 181% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.904761905 120.699889404 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9047619048 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 57.1716941757 45.7405998639 125% => OK
Elegance: 2.16981132075 1.45489161554 149% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38804817136 0.300154397459 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121189241608 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0829312026764 0.0752933317313 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594266562203 0.497263757937 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164805862284 0.151897553556 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173579394802 0.114077575197 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536640134741 0.0781384742642 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.56679604072 0.336927656856 168% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0701236067655 0.067059652881 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287118698974 0.210909579961 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222789837618 0.0618886996521 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.