1. Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author asserts there are two conventional schools about the characteristic of a successful leader. One school believes that the competition is the vital element of success by the manager; on the other hand, the other school overweighs the role of cooperation in the triumph of the leader. In what follows, I will list the possible reasons for both opinions and finally, state my position toward the issue.
The opinion that highlights the importance of the competition for the success of the leader seems to possess this outlook that having the sense of racing keeps you closer to success. In fact, the human being has an abysmal for achievemnt; consequently, there is no end for the progress. In this scenario, there will be someone who is more prosperous than others in the specific field; therefore, by possessing a competitive spirit, the leader will have a plan to be a step further than other managers on that area. This position seems considered as the warranted success for the leader by the first group.
As mentioned, another group give value to the sense of cooperation in becoming a successful leader. This group thought-out cooperation as a platform for rearing and exchange the knowledge and information for the shit. In other word, with cooperation there is a basement with greater networking that supports and shares for the purpose of more productivity; besides, more productivity is an indicator of success. The example of score could shed the spotlight for better understanding of this viewpoint. In the score game, the cooperation between the scorers and team leader provide a lucid understanding for the leader about the team. In this case, the leader completely knows which player has which strength and what kind of team combination could lead to success. Thus, this type of success is unachievable unless there will be cooperation between the members and the leader.
I should say that it is the second perspective with which I largely concur. First of all, from my point of view, the reason for which the second group relies on to support the idea is sensible and plausible. Furthermore, I have one more reason which makes me believe that the successful manager should be cooperative rather than the competitive. The fact which is underestimated by the first school is the main responsibility of a leader. The crucial duty of a leader is handling teamwork. The base of the teamwork is collaboration. In fact, a team is a network with various organs each of which possess a role for the thrive of a team and it is unachievable utile there will be the assist between them. Therefore, the main role of the leader is providing the required assist between the organs to guaranteed success. That is how cooperation outweighs the competition.
To wrap it up, although there are two different perspectives about the main feature for the success of a leader. From my perspective, cooperation is more important than competition.
- tpo 32.1 70
- notefull 83
- . Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
- tpo 20.1 80
- tpo32 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 490, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... duty of a leader is handling teamwork. The base of the teamwork is collaboration. ...
^^^
Line 4, column 615, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...organs each of which possess a role for the thrive of a team and it is unachievable utile ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, in fact, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00406504065 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93350075235 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434959349593 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9489107597 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.48 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.68 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278040017584 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837569417853 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058322580811 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164673140756 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534676120892 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.