Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Do you think communication by email is as effective as in person communication? In the contemporary world, with the galloping rate, at which science and technology are flourishing, there are many ways to communicate remotely instead of in person communication. Nowadays, some students are exploiting the Internet so as to communicate with their partners with email. Answering the question of whether using email is as advantageous as in person communication can provoke imminent controversies owing to a variety of factors contributing to the formation of a multidimensional viewpoint involving careful analysis. A number of people are in the conviction that using email enables us to communicate about a project very efficiently and leads to a better result. Their supposition is at odds with some others' from another camp embracing the view that communicating by means of email is not as beneficial as in person communication, and they suffer from serious issues; in fact, from my vantage point, the latter carries more weight. Reasons directing me toward this belief are manifold, but two conspicuous of which are: communicating by email can be misleading, and students complete projects in a shorter amount of time using in person communication, upon which I elaborated the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, one cogent reason corroborating my deduction is that in person communication convey information among partners comprehensively. However, remote communication can be misleading. Students may not understand their partners' true purposes and make wrong decisions.
Consequently, they would need to spend a considerable amount of time correcting their mistakes which could have been prevented easily by holding an in person meeting. For instance, a research conducted by researchers at Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran, revealed that students who communicate about their projects using email obtain twenty percent less grade than students doing their projects along with others in person. Ergo, it can be readily confirmed that remote communication not only is not beneficial but also can damage students' grades and performance.
The second compelling reason deserving some words here is that having a group meeting and discussing the projects is more efficient. In this way, students can discuss the whole thing in one meeting. On the other hand, Some students may not check their emails frequently or be busy at some time. Therefore, the same discussion may take more than one day to complete. It can be exemplified by referring to my personal experience, engraved on my heart, of writing a paper using email. We missed the conference's deadline because my partner did not check her email frequently, so she ended up responding to some of my questions regarding materials in the paper after the deadline. Thus, using email for project communication can provoke many difficulties.
All in all, if the above discussion is contemplated, it can be concluded that despite having many advantages, using email for intergroup communication is not a very wise choice. Indeed, it can cause the project to last for a long time having worse results. </span><br>
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 55
- tpo 39 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 42
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...me students are exploiting the Internet so as to communicate with their partners with em...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...th their partners with email. Answering the question of whether using email is as advantageous as in pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'conferences'' or 'conference's'?
Suggestion: conferences'; conference's
...ting a paper using email. We missed the conferences deadline because my partner did not che...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49799196787 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32615535758 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534136546185 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6136478228 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.454545455 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191385638186 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624657106199 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501841073857 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109703719319 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566313410432 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.