Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long for the following reasons.
First, nobody would be delightful while doing the same thing all day long, including students and workers. For example, when I was in college, I was bored to death while Thursday which is the day I need to take a financial course of 4 hours. The reason why I could not stand for it is because my ability to stay focus would decrease by time and I would rather change the subject I studied. I wouldn't stay focus on only one task for 4 hours not to mention all day long. It is the same idea of workers. Spending long period of time working on only one task is not only torturing to their mind but also decreasing their ability of focus their attention on the work, which will making them work inefficiently. Thus, workers would not be satisfied by doing similar tasks all day.
Second, workers often satisfied by learning from their works. They would definitly absorb more lessons while they have many different types of tasks to do than just doing similar jobs all day. For example, when I was an intern in the company which providing taxi survies to consumers, I have multiple works need to do, such as doing the paper work of evaluting the qualification from drivers, marketing, and maintain the balance between the cost and the budget. I have learned a lot of sliils from scratch during I did an abundant of different tasks day by day. Therefore, I was satisfied everyday when I worked in that company due to the fact that I am not only completing my work but also improving different types of skills.
Last but not least, opponents would say that doing similar tasks all day long can increase the efficiency of working because workers do not need to think too much during working when all tasks are similar. However, it is implausible. Workers would be inefficient while they don't have much space to use their brains. If you know every level of a game is similar, will you even want to play it? The answer is clear. None of us would like to do something which would absolutely bore us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in t 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... rather change the subject I studied. I wouldnt stay focus on only one task for 4 hours...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the same idea of workers. Spending long period of time working on only one task is not only to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...tly absorb more lessons while they have many different types of tasks to do than just doing si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 590, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... day by day. Therefore, I was satisfied everyday when I worked in that company due to th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...Workers would be inefficient while they dont have much space to use their brains. If...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55076142132 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37397578648 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.205631147 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3684210526 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480368012318 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153922733875 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179462239596 0.0737576698707 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.398953453905 0.150856017488 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207477648735 0.0645574589148 321% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.