Do you agree or disagree? It is important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
The question is whether people should avoid making new friends and maintain the old friendships or not. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint can retain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to refute the aforementioned idea. There are several merits that new relationships can provide for us. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them to empower my vantage point in following essay:
To begin with, one should not forget that old friends have been playing a pivotal role in our life; hence, making new friends does not mean to ignore our old peers. Nowadays, people are living in a technology-driven world; consequently, such a complex circumstance requires them to keep up themselves with the modern knowledge of society. For achieving new experiences and walking in prosperity roads, human beings have to connect to others. It goes without saying that meeting different people with diverse backgrounds can assist the young to share their opinions and obtain a variety of useful experiences. Attaching to the past and having stable function in a way will not be effective in such modern world.
The second reason for my argument lies in the fact that sometimes friends attempt to pursue their connections just for old dependence toward each other; however, they may not share their common interests. Besides, a new friend is able to motivate us to try new things. To elucidate, take my own experience. Last year, I had a chance to get familiar with a girl as my colleague. She made a decision to travel Roma and asked me to accompany her in this trip. Frankly, I was reluctant because I was always used to staying at home alone but this time, due to her insistence, I tried a new idea. In short, not only was watching Roma the best event in my life, but also it could stimulate me to study in archaeology field in the university.
Moreover, making new friends can help people to optimize interpersonal skills. Take a shy person who has trouble in confronting with strange people. If the same person is able to enter to the new relationships, his personality and self-confidence can boost.
As I have illustrated, I strongly agree with making new friendships. Despite all of its risks- as we all know today's, relying on people is very difficult than past- advantages that new friends bring us outweigh to its disadvantages like broadening knowledge base or experiencing new excitements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
- Some people feel that humans should be able to dig for oil anywhere, as long as it benefits mankind. Other believes that certain areas of land should be reserved for animals use. Which do you think is better? 90
- do you agree or disagree? children should play in outside with their friend than staying at home and playing with computers or cell-phones. 90
- tpo40 82
- Tpo12 83
- Do you agree or disagree? Universities should spend more money on improving facilities than on hiring famous professors. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, frankly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, i feel, in short, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94915254237 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90916444212 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605326876513 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1382858772 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.65 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198008080452 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585503345694 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662339416965 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112921413763 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032044336928 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.