Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.
Today, making good friends and keeping your friendship alive is very difficult. Trust and honesty are the most important characteristics that every friendship requires for surviving. Hence, the question is there is any human who can guarantee to always be completely honest with his friends. Indeed, I believe being always completely honest is impossible because honesty leads to criticism that is not pleasant for all people. Moreover, trusting completely even to your closest friends is risky. I will illustrate my reasons in the next paragraphs.
First, honesty leads to criticism that some people don’t like it. In other words, some moments aren’t very important and if you want to be completely honest with your friend, you have to criticize him. Thus, as a result of this criticism, your friend may become upset which may hurt your friendship eventually. For example, once, my friend asked my opinion about a musical track that he played himself. Although I didn’t like it at all, I preferred to doesn’t criticize him because he had just begun the music class and if I told him my honest opinion he might become upset which might have led to hurting our friendship.
Second, trusting people even who are closest to you is risky. In fact, everybody may have some secrets that he doesn’t want anyone else knows about them. Thus, when you tell your secrets to another person, even if you trust him completely, you increase the risk of revealing your secret because they may not be reliable as much as you think or they may reveal your secret by accident. Indeed, it is clear that with increasing the number of people who know a secret, the possibility of spreading the secret will increase. For example, when I was a student at university, I had a roommate in the dorm who was my closest friend. I had always talked to him about my thesis issues and other things that I didn’t want anyone else to know about them. Once when we were in a friendly meeting, he started talking about a problem that I told him before. Indeed, it was a secret and I didn’t want to others know about it, but he revealed my secret accidentally.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that being always completely honest with a friend is impossible.
- TPO 49 76
- If there’s a way to improve yourself, which one among the three choices you would take?۱٫ take more exercise۲٫ eat healthy food۳٫ reduce the amount of stress 70
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored oplympic teams. 73
- Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5-10 behave better ( for example by speaking more respectfully 70
- TPO 43 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, for example, in fact, talking about, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88946015424 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72530918525 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480719794344 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4933786391 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250864289841 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837323081393 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107396986079 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205670740501 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890728930457 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.