Do you agree or disagree? It is more important for governments to spend more money to impros\ve the internet tan to improve public transportation.
Spending budget more on which kind of sectors by governments have been a controversial heated-debate among people in every society. Opinions are divided on whether it is paramount to spend more money to improve public transportation or to improve internet access. Personally, It is my firmed conviction that improving internet access is more sensible in this modern era because of od its benefits. In the ensuing paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint for two conspicuous reasons.
The first worth mentioning reason to champion my stance is that the internet has become a crucial necessity in which makes facing crisis far easier. To be more specific, through the internet the governments are capable of serving their communities in other ways within hard situations that can happen very where every time. The coronavirus crisis is a compelling example to clarify this. Last year most of the countries had to take place strict restriction to avoid spreading the pandemic such as lockdown schools. Consequently, the countries had efficient internet could handle the situation by teaching student online while some countries had extreme difficulties especially in rural areas where did not have access to the internet. As a result, it can be inferred that having a super-fast internet haw much could help governments to cope with crises.
The second notable point to support my outlook is that having super-fast internet makes it possible to work remotely resulted in decreasing air pollution by cutting down on dispensable commuting by employees. Actually, it is an undeniable fact that nowadays most of the employees depend on cars to reach their workplaces and also, cars are polluting air via releasing harmful poisonous gasses. However, If they have access to such super-fast internet, They will be able to have their jobs are done at home that results in fewer vehicles on the streets, and as a consequence, the level of air pollution goes down significantly in cities. Therefore, authorities should dedicate more budget to improve the internet since it could be an effective way to have cleaner air in cities that today they are suffering from.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I reckon the idea that authorizes should devote more money to enhance the quality and speed of the internet. This is because the super-fast internet helps governments to hand crisis situations. Besides, it contributes to declining in air pollution by providing the opportunity of working remotely.
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 86
- The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area but rather introduced to it It has spread to many regions of Earth and caused great damage to native ecosystems In recent decades the crazy 90
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 83
- On a recent New Year s Day residents of a North American town awoke to discover that thousands of birds had died the night before and that their bodies were lying in open spaces and in the roads The dead birds had apparently fallen out of the sky during t 76
- At a sale at a private home in California several years ago a man purchased a box of photographic negatives stored in envelopes negatives are photographic images on film or glass from which actual photographs can be made The negatives dated from the 1920s 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, i reckon, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23690773067 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91945937027 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571072319202 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9547075816 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.529411765 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217046336602 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744041421536 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878442517575 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149833332273 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980423474384 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.