Do you agree or disagree? It is more important to keep your old friends rather than making new friends.
In today’s convoluted world, making friends is one of those issues considered as one of the indispensable parts of every individuals’ life. People need to establish relationships with different minds and thoughts to make their talents flourished. From my perspective, it is imperative to make new friends in the manifold juncture of life, and I have a couple of reasons to lend credence to this view.
First and foremost, making new friend broaden people’s horizons, leading them to get mature through coping with others. It is crystal clear that people need to make friends with disparate characteristics and features to heighten their awareness about minds, which prepare them to get acquainted with different moods. So, this improves people’s capability to socialize with others more conveniently and have contributed considerably to the sense of collectivism in any given society. In this regard, It has been widely acknowledged that in more collective nations such as China and Japan, people are noticeably extroverted, conducting people to be considerate about their common goals such as eliminating the illiteracy across their country. Hence, well aware of the benefits of establishing relationships with different thoughts, individuals, in most developed countries, are encouraged to improve their communication skills to ameliorate the level of consideration about each other.
Besides, making new friends opens miscellaneous opportunities for people, like finding a decent job or getting married as well. With no shadows of doubt, in this competitive world, people are inspired to expand their relations to fulfill their requirements in contact with different people. Though being intelligent and diligent, individuals cannot reach their goals without being able to make new relations. To be more elucidate, assume a person provided a decent job related to his capabilities in a multinational company. Only if that person has had the ability to establish relations with various people with different culture and backgrounds can be able to be accepted in the job interview of a top-tier multinational enterprise.
Moreover, the ability to make and maintain a relationship with different thoughts cannot be gained fortuitous. It needs a great deal of time and years of dedication to strengthen these skills. Admittedly, with more cultural globalization and homogeneity, the significance of establishing relationships with the greater strata is inexpressible in words.
In the final analysis, it is so beneficial for people to be able to make new friends with different people. This is because this helps them to be capable of communicating with various minds, and people are provided with more opportunities in their critical issues.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "We can learn more from people at a higher level than us (like teachers) than from people who are at the same level as us". 80
- Opening a new place such as shopping malls, food courts, or recreational areas brings several changes to the community. These businesses can be an underlying cause of the prosperity for any given society. Inaugurating a new restaurant in my neighborhood w 88
- TPO44 73
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, then, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59047619048 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29036592745 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9971104969 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.444444444 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10753106171 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472052660928 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383118001592 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760226598569 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234251265994 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.