Do you agree or disagree? It is more important for people to watch or read news presented by others who hold different views than by others who hold similar views.
In these days, there are many mutual misunderstandings between conservative people and liberal people. Nowadays, people usually acquire news from social media such as Facebook, which often displays liberal press to the people who have progressive ideas, and vice versa. However, I agree with the statement, that obtaining news from people who hold different views is more important than getting news from others who hold similar opinions, and I will show that my idea is reasonable by discussing below two points, -- people can understand the world without bias, and people can find better way to solve problems.
First, people may understand more correctly by accessing the information they may overlook if they access to diverse views of the problem. People who only read the news from the people who hold similar opinions will always have a biased understanding of the situation. And this bias can cause severe mistakes in decision-making. The most obvious example is the Japanese people in World War 2. In that time, almost all the media in Japan was controlled by the Japanese government, and they didn’t report the real situation of the war. Therefore, many Japanese people believed that the Japanese army broke the American military many times. On the other hand, some Japanese people could read English and access to foreign media, could figure out the real situation of the battle, and they could predict that Japan would lose earlier. This is an extreme example. However, reports can be biased or amended by pressure, or even belief of the writer. And, if you keep reading that news that contains many types of opinion, even if they are not in line with your own idea, you can figure out the world more correctly.
And secondary, people may find a better solution to the problem by acquiring news presented by others who hold a different view. You can adopt those different opinions, and, you can find a better way to solve problems. If you only read the news written by someone who has similar views as yours, such reading only reinforces your internal viewpoint, and you will lose a chance to discover better solutions. Broadening other people’s points of view through reading different opinions, people can get better ideas and avoid being conservative or biased.
In conclusion, sometimes we have to read similar views to support my point of view and find your companions. However, by reading different ideas, you may understand the situation or structure of the problem better, and you may find a better idea than your original opinion. Therefore, I definitely agree with the statement that it is much more critical for people to absorb news from others who hold different views than from the people who contain similar viewpoints.
- Do you agree or disagree? It is more important for people to watch or read news presented by others who hold different views than by others who hold similar views. 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away--Wait until the class or meeting i 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- Do you agree or disagree? It is more important for people to watch or read news presented by others who hold different views than by others who hold similar views. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61190880741 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464912280702 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.383560625 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422841522484 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128931400136 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134912342092 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311803404663 0.150856017488 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790115563225 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.