DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT PEOPLE OF TODAY ARE LESS HAPPY AND SATISFIED AS COMPARED TO PEOPLE OF THE PAST?
Currently, the world has changed on a massive level to a very different shape. The change which has occurred in the world has had a grave impact on the lives of people. There is undoubtedly sharp contrast in the frame of minds as well as the contentment level of people of this age. The new world order, has changed the shape of psychology of contemporaries.
Presently, with the advent of science and technology there has been the beginning of the Information Age.
Everyone is highly involved in the race of competition and earning. Today's individual, is much more stressed, exhausted and preoccupied with the notion of surpassing one's contemporaries. Resultantly, he has completely neglected the aspect of physical and mental health care. Unfortunately, bloodshed and genocide is widespread in all nukes and corners of the world. The prevalence of misery and depression has terribly deteriorated the mental peace and serenity of people of this age. Humanity is crying for mercy. Therefore, in such state of affairs, sadness and gloom has completely taken over our minds. No one can be seen completely blissful. This melancholy has damaged our spirituality and emotional stability. Fearfulness, apprehension and anxiety are the new way of life.
Contrarily, the people of the past were much luckier as compared to today's partially stable man. In the past, there was much more joy and nature could be seen lot more flourishing. There was so much simplicity, less vulgarity, more sensitivity to pain and problems of other human beings. There was value of blood more than money. People were more considerate, kind and helping. There strong spirituality was the pillar of their noble personalities. There was lesser greed and more graciousness. There was lesser right snatching and violence. Crime rates us not that high. Overall, it was a much better place to live in.
Conclusively, I would strongly agree that people of the past were much happier and contented as compared to today’s unfortunate beings. If only, the leaders of the world sit down with genuine concern and try to sort out the issues of the people, this world could be a better place. The United Nations should seriously look into all the conflicts and deal with a thought process prioritizing the ethics and decorum for well-being of humanity.
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 94
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH STATEMENT THAT SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE ALWAYS KEEP ON DOING NEW THINGS AND TAKE UP NEW CHALLENGES RATHER THAN DOING WHAT THEY ALREADY NO WELL.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 90
- PETS AS FAMILY MEMBERS DO U AGREE OR DISAGREE? 76
- Very generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different?From your parents' generation? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...eoccupied with the notion of surpassing ones contemporaries. Resultantly, he has com...
^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he people of the past were much luckier as compared to todays partially stable man...
^^
Line 4, column 495, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...was lesser greed and more graciousness. There was lesser right snatching and violence...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11578947368 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93405829201 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560526315789 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6393959979 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4285714286 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5714285714 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.46428571429 5.45110844103 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144493321451 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033992113801 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718432636007 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654729799831 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475967779686 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.