Do you agree or disagree? People who always criticize
others cannot be a member of a group.
Nowadays, group activity or team working have been increasing among the society and workplace in order to go ahead the aim of group and firm. It can not be denied that in every group comprise a wide variety of people and personality. Some members of a group have an exclusive and sole personality that always they are criticize activity and character of other members. It seems that this behaviour could have merits and disadvantage but I feel that the demeirts is outweighted. In the following paragraphs I will elaborate my reasons.
the most noteowrthy point to substantiate my viewpoint is that this behaviour could have adverse reprecussion on others. In one hand, It can hurts the feeling of our friends to criticize of our friends and peers straightforwardly without thinking about negative results. In fact, some of our friends can hurts their feeling and passion or even worse it can reduce their self-confidence. On the other hands, it is more likely that our friends would be hate and disguse from our criticization and our individual. My own example is compelling to justify my notion. As far as I remember, when I was a high school student, I participate in school association and I put carelessly my harsh comment on one of the member's work. As a reslut, she could not deal my stiff criticize and left the group and leave that activity as far as I know. Afterwhile, I was thinking that my function was very unappropriate and prehaps others want to do not member of that group. Were I put my words and comments less straightforward and indirect ways, she would not have that group.
Another equal note to mention is that maybe always be criticize other person can be impress others that I am a stone-hearted and without mankind passion. Indeed, this uncomfortable atmosphere would produce unfriendly situation for group members and they can not freely share their idea and thoughts. As a result, it could reduce the producivity of team and lead to unwilling circumstance. For instance, when i participate in scientific association during university education, one of my friends almost criticize of other members and distrub the flow of discussion. In fact, it was sort of waste of time and feeling at that time to get away from that atmosphore. Sometimes, I had a desire that this member do not participate in the group.
To draw aa comprehensive conclusion according to the afrementioned reasons, I am on the opinion that the harsh and constant criticize could hurts feeling and function of participant of a group. Even worse, It could be possible to show a hateful and cold-heart personality through continuse and direct by criticizer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | Hoda95 | 83 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | hooria am | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-09 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-05-09 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | kamyar.sa | 70 | view |
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 66
- cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields 3
- Summarize the points about Artificial reefs in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today's world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer." 76
- bb 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'criticized'.
Suggestion: criticized
...d sole personality that always they are criticize activity and character of other members...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ragraphs I will elaborate my reasons. the most noteowrthy point to substantiat...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...graphs I will elaborate my reasons. the most noteowrthy point to substantiate m...
^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'hurt'
Suggestion: hurt
...ecussion on others. In one hand, It can hurts the feeling of our friends to criticize...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'be' and 'criticize'.
Suggestion: be always criticize
...her equal note to mention is that maybe always be criticize other person can be impress others that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 410, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...illing circumstance. For instance, when i participate in scientific association d...
^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'hurt'
Suggestion: hurt
... the harsh and constant criticize could hurts feeling and function of participant of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...personality through continuse and direct by criticizer.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, for instance, i feel, in fact, sort of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93303571429 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02387396819 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9839691741 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240757587728 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712851761932 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707894105241 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157389112554 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606383562079 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.