Do you agree or disagree with the statement? People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years.
As time goes on, the food habits of people change like many other of their habits. These days, there are many controversies among families about the way of preparing food; I mean cooking food at home as fast as possible or meticulously and by spending enough time on it, ordering food from restaurants and so on. Even though there are many people who insist on keeping the traditional way of preparing and cooking way, at home by organic materials; but there are some else who think people must go toward new way ones all of which are more convenient. I, personally, subscribe to this idea that the people must quit such a traditional way and I think this change will be happened in twenty years. By keeping the changing of life and converting of it to hectic life in mind, the people will not have enough time to spend a lot of time on preparing foods. It is not to mention that the human beings' point of view is boosting, so accordingly they will know more about the value of time and use it more properly. Thriving of technology gives hand to people in order to make their tasks easier in comparison to the past.
In first place, humans' lives is spectacularly changing by which each day of their lives is more hectic than their previous days. The reasons of such a change are the tough financial condition of new life, increasing of cost of living, enhancing of peoples demand and so forth all of which make people to work more and more. They spend most of their time in their work places, and the rest of time must be used for a lot of others task like practicing with their children to prepare them for their schools tasks, doing laundry, studying, named but a few. They cannot find time to spend on the cooking and preparing food. For example, I used to hold a calm life, and I didn’t need to work a lot, so accordingly I had a lot of time to do my routines and preparing and cooking food was one of them. But the life changing; the transport cost is increasing, the cost of teaching student is increasing, and having accommodation is going toward more required money and so on. All of these make me work these days more. I have recently gotten a second job in a library to afford my expenses, and I have not enough time to cook food every day. We go restaurants some meals or order food from them. I am sure in future years we totally spend the least time on preparing food because such a change in life will not stop. In fact, in future years, we will work more than now, and we cannot find preparing food time.
Secondly, in modern days, the people's perspective is changing. They are turning from time-waste activities towards time-savings ones. In additional, the thriving of technology provides them opportunity to choose modern machinery life. The time which is spent on preparing and cooking food is one of them. By seeing these, in the near future, a large percentage of people will prefer to do informative works like reading books, watching movies, exercising, going training classes and more instead of preparing and cooking work. They will understand the priceless value of time and use it in the better way. In addition, by prompting and thriving technology, they can find a lot of ways to prepare food, like using advanced cooking appliances by which they will be able to spend less time on preparing food, having a smart robot which can do some routine of people like cooking food and many other ways like these.
In summary, by taking all of these into account, I think that the people will spend less time on cooking and preparing food in twenty years. The everyday altering of life from calm and easy to hectic, the people cannot find enough time to spend time as much as these days. Also, it is clear that the knowledge of people are improving, and their perspective is boosting in a way which they will not waste their time at all on vain work like preparing food especially by thriving technology they can find good alternative ways to prepare food.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-16 | Mehran-mech.90 | 90 | view |
2018-09-10 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2015-11-02 | Gh.Ne | 80 | view |
- declining of population of sea otters 80
- A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time 73
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with them?(The Explanation type, generally one side of the issue is discussed) 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...od time. Secondly, in modern days, the peoples perspective is changing. They are turni...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i mean, i think, in addition, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 120.0 52.1666666667 230% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3272.0 1977.66487455 165% => OK
No of words: 719.0 407.700716846 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55076495132 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.17824056563 4.48103885553 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46277294328 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397774687065 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1018.8 618.680645161 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1237706094 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6785714286 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369723504827 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124972059457 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975498529234 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286373788672 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392563976475 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.