Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets.
Nowadays, as scientific researches develop at an astonishing rate, many countries have conflicts on sharing the results of researches. Some claims that sharing scientific improvements to the world benefits the whole human civilizations. In fact, scientific discoveries shouldn't be shared globally and government should utilize them as secrets in my opinion.
Considering the interest of the country, government could utilize the discoveries to enhance the power of nation as well as the economy. Once a new technology is invented, the discoverer is usually rewarded with patent for years. The patent aims to protect the benefits gained by the one who lead an improvement in scientific field. For example, Soviet Union used to grasp the most cutting edge technology of space exploration and passed many other countries. As other countries had conflicts with Soviet Union, they often evaluates the discoveries hold by Soviet and ended up with compromises. Further, since government need to hire new employees and more researchers, this increases the vigorousness of economy.
Moreover, keeping technology as secrets benefits the scientists. Few would doubt that scientists need incentives and motivations to explore further on researchers. If their results are shared worldwide and utilized by everyone, the significance of their contribution would be viewed less. Thus, as the researchers are likely be disappointed by the lack of attentions and rewards, they would be less passionate to do researches than before. When government support the local scientists with aids and propagation, they would feel acknowledged and become more willing to innovate. As a result, there will be further improvements of researches.
Granted, some believe that global scientists could be inspired by others' accomplishment and generate more improvements benefiting whole human civilization. Though the inspiration do make a great help of science development, the lack of knowledge protection actually harm the innovators and discourage inventions. Imagine that your discoveries spending huge amount of money and time could be used by anyone. Would you feel that your discoveries help yourself more than others? In fact, many would take the free rider of others' researchers and be less focus on their original ideas. Thus, the creativity of whole world is diminished.
Although sharing scientific results is a great way to inspire more researchers, it is still better for countries to keep their discoveries as secrets. Not only does this approach improve the power and economy of countries, it also encourage scientists to explore and generate more results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-20 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | raspberry_momo | 92 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | raspberry_momo | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | Ericaa | 65 | view |
- Which of the following should the government to spend money to benefit city or region most A Providing more affordable housing B Decreasing air and water pollution C Attracting new businesses to the city or region 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Scientific discoveries should be shared globally and the government should not keep them as secrets 92
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ations. In fact, scientific discoveries shouldnt be shared globally and government shoul...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... global scientists could be inspired by others accomplishment and generate more improv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...power and economy of countries, it also encourage scientists to explore and generate more...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5682382134 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08448203025 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531017369727 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7356556673 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5652173913 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5217391304 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26248988107 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704349478911 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881476234952 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146415243029 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856396937721 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.