do you agree or disagree. In today's world there are more strict rules for young people to obey and follow.
There is no denying to the fact that governments have played a pivotal role in every society. In such a sophisticated world, where we are living, societies have various rules to govern their own countries. The controversial question which arises here is whether nowadays, governments have regulated strict rules towrads young people, and they expect young people follow these rules. I personally contend that societies have strict rules for young people. In what follow, two elaborate reasons will vindicate my standpoints.
The first reason is that as can felt, the population of world in general and every country in particular is increasing in unexpected way. As a consequence, the rate of crime, complaint, and accident will have been increased by the population growth. If authorities do not regulate the strict rule in the society, these problems and issues will acure in a complex manner. Moreover, young people are not sufficiently mature, and they not make a rational decision in some situation, so the rate of these crimes and problems are more between young people. By regulating strict rules, the society can decrease this problems generally in the country especially between young people who their personality and mentality are forming.
The second reason is that, although the technology has made people's lives easier, it is true that many problems have been complicated. For example, many harmful materials such as drugs, weed, and alcohol are more available among people, or people can easily find how to use this harmful materials by surfing on the Internet. Young people are not mature enough, and they may imitate by watching this videos. If government regulate some strict rule and place some heavy penalty for this crime. Yong people have to obey this strict.
In short, governments regulate strict rules towards young people because of the hard and complex situation of the societies. Moreover, young people expose to more dangers situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | hossein_mehri | 76 | view |
- Do you prefer watching TV programmes for knowledge or just for entertainment 81
- do you agree or disagree. In today's world there are more strict rules for young people to obey and follow. 76
- Do you prefer watching TV programmes for knowledge or just for entertainment 34
- Parents today are more involved in their children's education than in the past. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a complex manner" with adverb for "complex"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y, these problems and issues will acure in a complex manner. Moreover, young people are not suffici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... strict rules, the society can decrease this problems generally in the country espec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nough, and they may imitate by watching this videos. If government regulate some str...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dangers'' or 'danger's'?
Suggestion: dangers'; danger's
.... Moreover, young people expose to more dangers situation.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, in general, in particular, in short, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25079365079 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64814809529 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6936515777 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296627687847 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104068129243 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658190553015 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196857311058 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261476432949 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.