Do you agree or disagree In the twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
Over the years, use of transportation has brought an immense comfortably to humanity. The enjoyment transportation brought made millions of people to have their personal cars. I agree with the idea that in the next twenty years, fewer cars would be in use than in present time. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, advancement in technology. Technology is growing rapidly everyday. Scientists are doing research everyday on how to make life easier and comfortable for people. The use of cars today is causing many problems like traffic congestion, accident etc, this made researchers working effortlessly to proffer solutions. For example, a new car called 'tesla' has been made with the help of development in technology whereby, in the next few years we will not need more drivers on the road. This tesla car drives on it' own, no need of any person to drive it in which no more accident with this tesla car because it's controlled by computer. Therefore, increase in technology will help us reduce cars in future.
Secondly, government policy will bring greater change on future transport. Some country policies will definitely reduce the use of transports as time goes on. Many government laws are now carried out in eradicating and banning the use of unwanted vehicles in their environment. Government has substituted the private cars with the public transports. For instance, in my country Nigeria, a new law is out that some private cars have been banned not to move again. They were replaced by public transport which actually reduced traffic congestion in my country. In the next twenty years with this policy, fewer cars will be available in my country.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that with increase in technology development and changes in government rules and regulations, there will be fewer cars in use in the nearer future.
- Do you agree or disagree In the twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 76
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 71
- Some people forbid young children from usin smatphones cellphones with internet accesss while others disagree and believe that they are importnt tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...chnology. Technology is growing rapidly everyday. Scientists are doing research everyday...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... in technology will help us reduce cars in future. Secondly, government policy will br...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07324840764 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8355200658 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2854130601 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8421052632 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301532002844 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857846877027 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095789441447 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187303795775 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259153688627 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.