Do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that clothes exhibit some important information about peoples. In dawn of humanity, humans attempt to dress some suitable clothes based on their habitat, statue in the society and their habits. Not all people concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that people’s clothes could be a proper factor to judge about their personality and characters. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the implication of the consistency among people job position and their costume based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction humankind should dress based on their job. For instance, people who work in offices and government organizations should dress formal. Doctors and nurses dress white uniforms which indicate their job statues. To sum, even though it is not correct in all situation, people used various style of clothing related to their occupations.
In addition to the reason raised above; impact of people’s tendencies and interests could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, people considers own interests in providing their clothes. To elucidate on, people with fashion dresses like to be up to date, and athletics use sports cloth. In addition, people wear dirty and untidy clothes are irregular and do not donate enough time for their appearance.
The last but not the least, wealth has played paramount role in the selected clothes by people. In some situation, people who are very rich use expensive jeans with valuable watches and jewels. In contrast, people with simple T-shirts and pants are not very rich and luxurious.
Drawing upon the reason, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that the people’s style for clothing could be used as identifying factor to judge about some partial personality or character features. There are some reasons such as wealth, statue in the job and interests which are influential in the people’s wearing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-07 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | atefe_mollazade | 81 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | zg1122 | 76 | view |
- Some people believe that video games could inspire young students' interest and make their study more efficient rather than distract them and be a waste of time, so young students should be allowed to play video games.Do you agree or disagree? 33
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-milli 3
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to relax through watching a film and reading a book than doing physical exercises? 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, people with simple T-shirts and pants are not very rich and luxurious. Drawi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28266666667 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86469265367 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6124902893 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.055555556 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144701537695 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498374292685 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295562241047 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848899619771 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275264037593 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.