Do you agree or disagree?Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree?

Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place

In the progressive world, where we live, technology and science play a significant role in the lives of human beings since they mainly determine the level of success and welfare in societies. While many people hold the opinion that the most crucial development for the quality of people's life has already taken place, others believe that technology should develop the welfare of humankind's life more than now. As for this writer's opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea; I believe that progress in human's life is in the initial steps and should be improved in the future by science. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.

The first exquisite point worth mentioning here is that, nowadays, hygiene and health matters are not at the pinnacle of achievements. To be more specific, there are a host of fatal and painful diseases, which have not had a particular remedy until now. So, the rate of death about these diseases is high, and it can solve in the future through intense researching are being done now. By way of illustration, the statistical studies reveal that every year, the rate of the HIV disease increase among people because of the poor cure related to this virus. HIV-virus could transfer easily, and if people get involved in this situation, they will become disappointment as a result of poor treatment strategies and cannot struggle with it. People encounter diseases, which make them anxious, and it has a detrimental effect on society like declining the life expectancy rate. Thus, under such a circumstance, health well-being can improve by uncovering some technologies and solutions to cure these diseases and increase the level of life's quality.

Furthermore, humankind has proposed a myriad of theories and projects which could revolutionize the people's lives, but they are not practical yet. In other words, some of human's dream and demands will be provided in the future through the progress of state-of-the-art technologies and implementational projects. These projects and discoveries can influence on people’s lifestyle, and individuals will be equipped with a comfortable status. It is axiomatic that some people think important device already have been provided because the imaginary of such strong and powerful discovery in the future is not perceptible for them now, but I firmly believe that the more technology develops and improves, the more welfare is provided for humans. For instance, I always think about life with robots in the future. Undeniably, it will have fruitful effects on people's life. These robots can do activities as well as humans like cleaning the house and every place. It will empower people to do other activities robots cannot do them, and consequently, everyone will have more delightful and suitable life more than now. Therefore, it is indisputable that technology and science could change the world with the future's discovery dramatically and severely.

By perusing the above paragraphs, it can be concluded that the essential explorations for a high quality of life have not occurred until now. The human's lives not only need a high level of hygiene and cure, but they also can be equipped by more modern implements and discovery such as robots.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-29 Royaaa 83 view
2019-09-21 faranaksln 73 view
2019-09-21 faranaksln 73 view
2019-09-21 faranaksln 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user faranaksln :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the progressive world, where we live,...
^^^
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ankinds life more than now. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wpoint are elaborated upon hereunder. The first exquisite point worth mentioni...
^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ments. To be more specific, there are a host of fatal and painful diseases, which ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increase the level of lifes quality. Furthermore, humankind has proposed a my...
^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the humans') or simply say ''some humans''.
Suggestion: some of the humans; some humans
... are not practical yet. In other words, some of humans dream and demands will be provided in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'futures'' or 'future's'?
Suggestion: futures'; future's
...science could change the world with the futures discovery dramatically and severely. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discovery dramatically and severely. By perusing the above paragraphs, it can...
^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'live'.
Suggestion: live
...have not occurred until now. The humans lives not only need a high level of hygiene a...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2730.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19011406844 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86823350418 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6101886283 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232290938246 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653253732578 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053042101457 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139440568709 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719647672842 0.0645574589148 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.