do you agree or disgree with keeping old friends or makiing new ones.. thanks in advance..
Friends play an inevitable role in the life of all people. And I personally think it is better to keep old friends than making new ones for the following main reasons.
It is very obvious that With already existing friend you have spent some time of your life because already existing friends have been there with you for a long time. Due to this there is almost no gap in between them on so many levels. They also know each other very well. They have the idea of each others' nature and hence dealing could be done so easily with them. They are familiar with each other routines and daily activities of life very well. So it becomes very comfortable with them.
With already existing friend you have build this trust over a period of time. With new friends you would need that much time again to build the trust and making new friends means taking a new risk at one level. You might get deceived while making new friends. Building trust would require may require a huge ammount of time again and at the end the you may not get good or desired results with new friends. For example My brother as got admission in the unveristy where he was trying to make new friends. Due to trusting his new colleagues so many times he got trapped in worse situations in the university environment
Old friends have already contributed in some way to your life, will have helped you in so many situations, so it seems very natural and is sensible to keep them friends ahead in life too.
Old freinds have already made some acquaintance with your family. So it also convenient for the family to deal with him and trust him. On the other hand making new friends would require to establish this bond again from the beginning which would put the family members and the new friend as well in this inconvenience.
- aa 3
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your response. 60
- United Kingdom's archaelogy 3
- About dinosaurs 81
- In this stimulating, wide-ranging course, Professor Drezner shows that achieving prosperity involves more than economics. Psychology, sociology, political science, and history also come into play. By taking this broad view, he leads you to fundamental ins 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...r very well. They have the idea of each others nature and hence dealing could be done ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ling could be done so easily with them. They are familiar with each other routines a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 63, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...friend you have build this trust over a period of time. With new friends you would need that m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 346, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'you'?
Suggestion: the; you
...ge ammount of time again and at the end the you may not get good or desired results wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 187, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'establishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: establishing
...r hand making new friends would require to establish this bond again from the beginning whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55214723926 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21771291938 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3487847463 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2941176471 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247468377349 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893921624598 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616239874679 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152890958795 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028107746063 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.