Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Human has always gotten used to living in a society. They would like to be closer with some specific people that name friends. Friends are someone who we usually love them like our families. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether people easily learn from their friends or not. Certainly, some people if asked would agree with the statement that we easily learn from our friends while others would mention that the question depends on a great deal of factors like type of personality or environment of friendship. As far as I’m concerned, I adopt a firm position that we could learn from our friends particularly if our friendship to be extant. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
First of all, it’s important to consider when friendship is durable, people inadvertently influence each other. Doubtlessly, some people think they have independent personality and are never affected by others. However, in most cases when people spend many times with each other, they are spontaneously under the influence of their friends. Indeed, after a while people get used to do something that their friends do whether good or bad. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. I remember my nephew when lived with us for two years, he got used to do everything which has done by me and my brother like some bad habits that we did. Similarly, I can recollect that I spoke with different idiom when I was living in campus dormitory because there were a lot of student from other states with different idiom. As you can see, there is an Old Persian proverb with this purport that people could do and treat like someone who is their friend.
Equally important is that people usually trust their friends, that is, because they trust their friends they would like to learn from them. Of course, for some people in some situation, there is no trustworthy friend. However, it would be fair to say that for most people it will be a kind of challenge to trust their friends and learn from them, because they believe their friends could be the best people, who teach them, guide them and treat them like a hero. According to a recent research conducted in my country, people think they learn from their friends and imitate their habits because their friends are trustworthy humans beside them. Therefore, faith or confidence is one of the significant reasons that causes people easily learn from their friends.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I’m of the opinion that in most case people could easily learn from their friend because of many times that they spend with each other and due to being faith between them. I hope people know that they must be more precisely about everything that they would learn deliberately or inadvertently from their friends because all people have some deficiencies or incompetence. As a result, I suggest conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’s deve 73
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school, which way can bring them the most benefit?1. To accumulate work experience by a part-time job or volunteering in a community2. Learning to play a sport3. Learning to play a musical ins 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to doing'.
Suggestion: used to doing
...hen lived with us for two years, he got used to do everything which has done by me and my ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of students'.
Suggestion: a lot of students
... in campus dormitory because there were a lot of student from other states with different idiom....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...at like someone who is their friend. Equally important is that people usually trust ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, while, kind of, of course, as a result, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 80.0 43.0788530466 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94379844961 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55093167661 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459302325581 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4143696432 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.913043478 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4347826087 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297826655023 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952065074716 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615431245011 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195683578742 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390504683251 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.