Do you believe that face-to- face communication is the best way
To begin with, face-to-face communication can enable students to digest their teacher’s advice more efficiently. In fact, a majority of students have questions related to academic materials, so receiving an explanation in person is more thorough than other methods of communication. When I was in college, when class was over, I used to have a lot of questions regarding the material. I found it more beneficial to acquire answers from my professors in person since they were better able to provide more in-depth and detailed explanations. This worked better than e-mail did for me. Therefore, direct communications facilitated the process of my learning journey.
Moreover, students can obtain an immediate response to their inquiries. Indeed, educators typically have busy schedules and sometimes do not check their e-mails regularly; therefore, students can simply visit them during their office hours or schedule an appointment when they require urgent assistance. Thus, face-to-face communication is the best manner when students need an instant answer to their inquiries.
Finally, the best approach to strengthen our ties in school, and even more so in the workplace, is to interact face-to-face. This is due to the fact we can be informal. For instance, when I used to work, I became friends with one of my co-workers. This is because whenever I visited her office, we had small chats about how she spent her weekend or talked about personal issues; so, by having those casual conversations virtually every day, with time, we became best friends. Hence, the best way to maintain long-term bonds in the workplace is to communicate in person because it could be more informal and sincere.
In conclusion, face-to-face interaction is beneficial since it allows students to digest information more easily, acquire the right way answers to their questions and nourish relationships. Hopefully, more individuals become aware of the substantial benefits it provides.
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 85
- Do you believe that face-to- face communication is the best way 76
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 52
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 3
- The Extinction of the Steller’s Sea CowA huge marine mammal known as the Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by George W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Euro 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the substantial benefits it provides.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47402597403 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11347893106 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600649350649 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1214440906 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236497604933 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793435682564 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108551123961 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148997255885 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267290975576 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.