Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
There are some moot points about which professor is better to take a course. The question of knowing the professor before taking a course or not has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, with weighing the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is better for students to familiar with professors manner and had a class with his or her before. Everyone has his or her zeitgeist. I have some reasons the most outstanding of which will be aptly explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that needless to say, each professor has his or her method, therefore, if students knowing something about their method they will be more successful in that course. Some professors are sensitive about present or absent students others are sensitive about classroom activities. Consequently, with understanding, these tips students can prosper in their courses. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student at the university we had two courses about soils mechanic with one professor. In the first term, I had not any information about the professor and was absent in some classes. The corollary of this action was my low-grade in the soils mechanic. After that in the next term, I knew our professor very well hence, I had not missed any class. Thus, I got the complete score in that course. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that knowing the professor method before taking a class is very crucial for students.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that when we know a professor and had a class with him or her, mutually, he or she knows us very well and familiar with our positive and negative aspect of us. In this situation, a professor can consider auxiliary projects or homework to boost their student's scores. My personal example demonstrates this reality in that soil mechanic courses in the second term, when my professor familiar with my difficulties in my job, allowed me to absent in some classes. As a result, this mutual familiarity helped me to earn the high score in that course. My personal experience shed some light to the point that it is very important for students to take a course with a professor who had a class with him or her before.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate, it is very beneficial for students to be familiar with their professors. This point not only helps them to take a higher score but also, lead to mutual familiarity which is very useful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | usef | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | Qq99 | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | mahi22 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-18 | ArashAlirezaei | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
- Tpo 42 80
- sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement?the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a personwho often strongly insists t 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past. 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77901785714 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77037525864 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448660714286 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0732085397 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.952380952 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217894200564 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720981179942 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627423958604 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143645492607 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703734073672 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.