Do you prefer working independently or with a group
Getting the job done perfectly is the ultimate goal for people. In order to achieve this goal, People have different thoughts and opinions about whether teamwork or individual work is best. While some people choose to work independently, personally I believe that group and teamwork is the best way to do it
There are many people out there who say “the only way to do something right is to do it yourself,” and while I can certainly understand this notion, I don’t particularly agree. Perhaps they feel this way because when working in groups, there is always the chance that someone in the group will not pull their own weight or actually hold the group back with distractions and meaningless. While it is true that there is always a chance that a bad actor will end up in the group, I feel that there is a better chance of increased productivity and creativity. By way of explanation, when I was in my last year of dental school, we had a large project. In the project, we could decide to work individually or in a group. I picked a group and got very lucky. My group had five people, including myself, and while there was one person who was lazy and didn’t do anything, the other three people added a lot of extra experience and context because they were all from different cultures. Overall it was a good thing to work in the group
As I stated previously, I believe that teamwork and group work, in general, is far superior and that individual work limits you negatively. When working in a group, despite the fact that you may have losers in your group, you have more chances to be connected with people having different skills, backgrounds, and experiences, which enriches the overall product. People who disagree with me might point out that it’s not always good when team members have different skills and backgrounds because it could lead to confusion or even leadership struggles. While it’s true that vastly different team members could lead to issues, in my experience, that’s more of a group dynamic problem. If you are unable to work with a dynamic team, then probably you would still have issues working with any team, and thus you would always miss out on the opportunities that bringing more people in afford you
To sum up, I firmly believe that group work is the best way to get the job done perfectly because it is a great way to have a variety of ideas and a very reliable way of saving time despite that fact that group dynamics can sometimes be challenging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Thomas2028 | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 70 | view |
- l 70
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- what is the most effective way of getting information about a job of interest asking friends sending a letter to companies searching on job advertisements 70
- It is more important to use the land for human needs like farms houses and factories than for saving endangered animals 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, i feel, in general, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67194570136 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59385070209 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47963800905 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.557280754 48.9658058833 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.5 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339879788834 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11905739154 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944686709129 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192144685706 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821869742781 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.