During the times of economic crisis which of the following should the government spend less money on a Education b Health Care c Support for the unemployed

Essay topics:

During the times of economic crisis, which of the following should the government spend less money on? a. Education b. Health Care c. Support for the unemployed

Some people think that the government sould spend less money on education during the time of economic crisis, other people think the target should be change from education to health care. However, I think that the money of support for the unemployed sould be decreased. Therefore, I support my statement for following reasons.

First of all, during the economic depression, the government cares about budget control, and reducing money on the unemployed can help it save more money. For example, when the American government met the Depression, it can decreasing free meals for the unemployed. Furthermore, it can also reduce the job training for unemployed people. As a result, the government can save more than 10000 USD for a month. Yet, if the American government reduce the budget for education, it could only save less than 5000 USD by decreasing the financial support on poor students. Apparently, reducing budget on education can not be helpful for the government to save more money.

Secondly, in the period of economic crisis, the government places emphasis on citizens’ well-being, but spending less money on health care would harm its citizens. For instance, when the Taiwanese government encountered some economic problems, it decided to decrease the time of hospital opening for more than 2 days a week. In addition, it also decrease some funding on medical supports, such as researching new medicine or renewing the medical equipments. Consequently, a lot of people suffered from disease, even die because of lack of care. Nevertheless, if the government decided to reduce budget from the unemployed, citizens would not be painful for virus and bacteria. Obviously, decreasing money on support for unemployed people is good to citizens’ well-being.

Last but not least, in the time of economic depression, the government focuses on its reputation, but spending less money on education would make the government notorious. For example, when the Indian government faced the economic depression, it increased the elementary schools’ tuition from 1000 to 2000 USD per semester. Additionally, the government also stopped to renew the learning equipments, such as computers and labs. Accordingly, a lot of people thought that the rule of Indian government was awful and asked it to quit. Nonetheless, if the government spent less money on the unemployed rather than education, citizens might think that their children’s right for learing was emphasized. Hence, all the world might regard India as a country which cares about education and respect the government.

In conclusion, I support that the government sould decrease the budget on support for the unemployed. After all, it cares about budget control, citizens’ well-being, and reputation.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-14 kevin1105 73 view
2023-03-14 kevin1105 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user kevin1105 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...other people think the target should be change from education to health care. However,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...ing money on the unemployed can help it save more money. For example, when the Ameri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...n government met the Depression, it can decreasing free meals for the unemployed. Furtherm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...han 2 days a week. In addition, it also decrease some funding on medical supports, such ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40322580645 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95597694484 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440092165899 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4728635274 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.956521739 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5217391304 5.45110844103 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46928073711 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13885473527 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088650919788 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282663177993 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999655434977 0.0645574589148 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.